Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


Daredevil #111 discussion
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vtsoxfan7 wrote:

When Matt 'passed' on Black Widow he was very much trying to come to terms with the fact that HE was not wanted. That particular situaiton with Milla requesting the divorce had nothing to do with how he felt. There was still the potential for her to change her mind and they could then go on to live 'happily ever after' so to speak (but hey, it's comics so we all know that wouldn't happen anyway).


Right, but you know what does this imply, don't you? Basically we're saying that staying faithful to a woman he knows he's married to depends only on her potential availability? That is quite miserable.
I think it's more a matter of personal truths, of moral boundaries. That's why I think the two situations are comparable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dimetre
Underboss


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1366
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like harryhausen, I also like Dakota a lot better than I ever liked Milla. That marriage always seemed like it was shoehorned into the book.

Of course what Matt did was wrong, but I saw it coming. It came a little sooner than I expected, and it did seem like he was being controlled by an outside force.

But really, women have always been Matt's weakness. When he was with Heather Glenn, he was hung up on Elektra. Don't tell me that if Elektra gave him the chance he wouldn't have cheated on Heather. But Elektra didn't, so it didn't happen.

Also, didn't Heather come in the middle of Matt's relationship with Natasha?

The Typhoid thing is different, because she was using her powers to manipulate Matt. But I recently reread #297, and Matt, while he's trying to restart things with Karen, throws himself at Typhoid and beds her. But it's all part of his larger plan to have her committed and remove her as one of Kingpin's pawns. Still...

I do think that Matt is a tremendously noble and upstanding individual. However his lovelife has always been where he falters. Brubaker is maintaining that I think. Matt takes responsibility for his actions and his sins, all the while screwing up his relationships. Makes for great reading.

By the way, nobody has mentioned the murder headline at the end of the issue. Nice development! Should make both Matt and Daredevil's life absolute hell. Obviously he's going to have to find and shake up the witness and get the truth, but that headline means damage is done.

Great issue!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:
Right, but you know what does this imply, don't you? Basically we're saying that staying faithful to a woman he knows he's married to depends only on her potential availability?

I will say this. My biggest moral problem with what Matt did isn't that he did it, but that it happened so soon. I think it's been about two to three months since Milla was institutionalized (#106 takes place a month after #105, some amount of time passes between #106 and #107, the Cruel and Unusual arc happens in a few days, and now we've been told that it's been a few weeks since Dakota was shot). That is not long enough for him to be thinking about other women.

However, your comment got me thinking in terms of hypothetical what-ifs? If Milla's condition hasn't improved in a year, would you then be morally okay with him filing for divorce? (Setting aside that this could be complicated since I assume he's probably her legal guardian.) If no, what about five years? Should marriage be until death do us part, no matter what? Should he be morally bound for life to a person with whom he can't have any kind of normal marriage and can't even go to visit? Is being faithful a principle that overrides everything else?

As wrong as his doing what he did was, particularly because of how little time has passed, part of me felt a little happy that he got to feel good about something for a change. I know, big shocker. The thing is, I don't even see this as a sign of a lack of commitment to Milla, though I suppose we will see how the events unfold. But in his mind, his wife is irretrievably lost to him. Being with her is an option that is not only remote, it doesn't even exist.

Ultimately, this is about good people sometimes doing things that are wrong. It happens all the time, and I never thought of this as something Matt would never do. I may take this more lightly than you because of personal circumstance in my own past (no, I never cheated on anyone...), but we can discuss that in the chat. Wink
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:

However, your comment got me thinking in terms of hypothetical what-ifs? If Milla's condition hasn't improved in a year, would you then be morally okay with him filing for divorce? (Setting aside that this could be complicated since I assume he's probably her legal guardian.) If no, what about five years? Should marriage be until death do us part, no matter what? Should he be morally bound for life to a person with whom he can't have any kind of normal marriage and can't even go to visit? Is being faithful a principle that overrides everything else?


No neat answer can be given. To a person who firmly believes in the importance of the bond to his/her significant other, marriage could well be for life, even (or especially) in those circumstances.
To a person who doesn't care about it, one could just go and jump into the bed with another person the very moment after the mate becomes unavailable.
In between these two extremes there all the other varieties of reaction.
I'll just say that the Matt Murdock I love to read would've been closer to the former extreme.

Quote:
but we can discuss that in the chat. Wink


Whenever you want Wink.

P.S.

I'll paste here what I've replied to you in Warren's blog, so that the discussion doesn't become too dispersed:

F wrote:
I think Brubaker should've explored more about this "loneliness", "being disheartened and lonely" angle.
One can certainly explain the deed with that. But upon re-reading the issue, almost nothing of that angle was properly addressed.
So far this whole aspect seems just a "post-eventum" interpretation given by readers.


Last edited by Francesco on Sat Sep 27, 2008 4:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:
I'll paste here what I've replied to you in Warren's blog, so that the discussion doesn't become too dispersed:

F wrote:
I think Brubaker should've explored more about this "loneliness", "being disheartened and lonely" angle.
One can certainly explain the deed with that. But upon re-reading the issue, almost nothing of that angle was properly addressed.
So far this whole aspect seems just a "post-eventum" interpretation given by readers.

Yes, I replied already. Wink

To me, asking someone to stay in a marriage that doesn't exist is too extreme. He would then be doing it solely on principle (he would not benefit, and neither would Milla), and I think I'm much too pragmatic for that. I do feel that this happened too soon, although that also kind of makes it more spur of the moment. He got caught up in something, and he absolutely regrets it. Not as much as he feels he should, but nevertheless. I think this devlopment is incredibly intriguing, and I hope to learn more about what makes Matt tick as a result of it.

Dimetre mentioned the murder headline. I saw someone comment on some blog about how having Matt have legal problems was repetitive, but I think this will be what Lady B says, it'll keep him occupied for a few days. The accusation won't stick and there won't be any major ramifications, unless it wakes up all the people who wanted him behind bars to begin with and gets all of that in motion again. But there certainly are tons of different things going on at the same time in this arc...
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
blacktyphoid
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dimetre wrote:

I do think that Matt is a tremendously noble and upstanding individual. However his lovelife has always been where he falters. Brubaker is maintaining that I think. Matt takes responsibility for his actions and his sins, all the while screwing up his relationships. Makes for great reading.



jumonji" wrote:
As wrong as his doing what he did was, particularly because of how little time has passed, part of me felt a little happy that he got to feel good about something for a change. I know, big shocker. The thing is, I don't even see this as a sign of a lack of commitment to Milla, though I suppose we will see how the events unfold. But in his mind, his wife is irretrievably lost to him. Being with her is an option that is not only remote, it doesn't even exist.

Ultimately, this is about good people sometimes doing things that are wrong. It happens all the time, and I never thought of this as something Matt would never do.


I am fascinated by the sympathetic reactions Matt's infidelities are receiving from some of the women on our list. As shown above, you even go as far as justifying it.

Some of the men, like Francesco, are more disturbed by it than the women.

I must be living in Superman's Bizzaro world.

______________________
blacktyphoid
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oops, triple post (that was weird...)
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers


Last edited by jumonji on Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blacktyphoid wrote:
I am fascinated by the sympathetic reactions Matt's infidelities are receiving from some of the women on our list. As shown above, you even go as far as justifying it.

Hmm, not justifying it as much as understanding it, if that makes any sense. As for the women's perspective in all of this, maybe women are more prone to understanding that strange emotions can sometimes get the better of us? Wink

Gender stereotypes aside, I do feel very ambivalent about all of this, but I tend to be a very forgiving person and I like to extend my forgiveness to fictional characters as well. We'll see how Matt redeems himself in the next few issues.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
vtsoxfan7
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 31 Jan 2006
Posts: 182
Location: The 'noke, VA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:
Right, but you know what does this imply, don't you? Basically we're saying that staying faithful to a woman he knows he's married to depends only on her potential availability? That is quite miserable.


I understand what you're saying, but I think your statement is oversimplifying the situation. The 'availability factor' is just one of many factors here that could contribute to Matt's acting the way he has.


jumonji wrote:
Hmm, not justifying it as much as understanding it, if that makes any sense.


I would have to agree. Whether we like it or not, agree with it or not, things like this happen everyday in today's society. Why shouldn't a very gray area be explored in a comic, let alone one that tends to have a more adult target audience such as DD?
_________________
https://twitter.com/tburnham7

http://tburnham7.blogspot.com/

'So I've got THAT going for me...which is nice' - Bill Murray, Caddyshack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blacktyphoid
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

vtsoxfan7 wrote:

jumonji wrote:
Hmm, not justifying it as much as understanding it, if that makes any sense.


I would have to agree. Whether we like it or not, agree with it or not, things like this happen everyday in today's society. Why shouldn't a very gray area be explored in a comic, let alone one that tends to have a more adult target audience such as DD?


Let's explore it. Absolutely! That's what we've been doing.

My comment wasn't about whether or not we should explore it; rather, it's about the interesting gender-based results of the exploration (thus far). Most of the female responses condon and/or accept Matt's adultery; there's even a sympathetic tone to the language. Whereas some of the male responses are highly critical of it. Personally, I would not have expected that type of gender-based outcome.

Besides, jumonji - all with all due respect - I think you're doing more than understanding it. I think you are condoning it.

Most of the women I know would condemn, not condone, Matt's actions - especially given the sad medical condition of his wife.

___________________
blacktyphoid
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave Wallace
Paradiso


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1074
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think that anyone is necessarily condoning Matt's actions. And I don't think that the fact that Brubaker has had Matt sleep with Dakota should be seen as Brubaker condoning his actions either. Instead, he's having Matt make a choice which is at best morally questionable, and exploring the character by doing so.

I think that some people are getting hung up on whether it's right or wrong for Matt to do this, when I think that the more interesting question is whether it's in-character for Matt do to this. And I think it is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave Wallace wrote:

I think that some people are getting hung up on whether it's right or wrong for Matt to do this, when I think that the more interesting question is whether it's in-character for Matt do to this. And I think it is.


I don't know if you're referring to me with that, but I assure you that I've been having Matt's "in-character-ness" in mind all the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blacktyphoid wrote:
Besides, jumonji - all with all due respect - I think you're doing more than understanding it. I think you are condoning it.

If I were condoning it, I would think that what he did was morally okay. I don't. I would have preferred that he hadn't gone that far honestly. Yes, I would have been more comfortable, as a fan of the character, if he had said "Sorry Dakota, I can't do this." I would have respected the character more for that, and I'm not 100% comfortable with how this all played out.

What I think I might be doing, is trying to preserve the character's inherent "goodness" in my mind. I want to understand why things happened this way, and I want to construct an idea in my mind that I'm comfortable with. I suppose you could call it a defense mechanism.

Another thing I'd like to bring up is Milla's condition in all of this. Some seem to feel that her condition makes Matt's philandering more "okay," whereas others feel the other way around. I'm in the former category. While I feel this development was much too fast for comfort, Matt has become sort of a pseudo-widower (did I just make up a new word?). I would have been much less comfortable with him being in a commited relationship that actually existed, as in composed of two people who live together and share the same bed, and then seeing him go off on the side and pick someone up in a bar. That is much more calculating in my mind, whereas this looks more like a person in grief seeking comfort. That's not condoning it, it's just trying to make sense of the chain of events.

In response to what Dave Wallace said, I agree that this isn't out of character for Matt. I'm still in the "Matt is (essentially) a nice person" corner, silly as that might sound, but he can be morally weak, and has been in the past as well.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dave Wallace
Paradiso


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1074
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:
I don't know if you're referring to me with that, but I assure you that I've been having Matt's "in-character-ness" in mind all the time.

No, I wasn't referring to anyone specific. I just think that it's important to remember that we're talking about the actions of Matt as a character, rather than whether adultery is right or wrong in real life.

And I agree with jumonji, Milla's condition makes this a very different situation to the way it would have been if Matt was cheating on her whilst they were still in a healthy relationship.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've understood your point of view, but I sill think it's very out of character. I've always seen Matt as one who has the strength to put his personal feelings aside, especially when those he cares for are involved. Moreover, he's always shown to be very committed to his marriage with Milla, he's always said to take it very seriously, especially during Bendis' run.
Thi is what strikes me most.

The question now should be, what are his feelings towards Milla, really?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 2 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group