Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


DD's "armor costume" "era"
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How did you feel about the armor costume stories?
Rocked!
33%
 33%  [ 5 ]
OK
33%
 33%  [ 5 ]
Terrible!
33%
 33%  [ 5 ]
other
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 15

Author Message
the gael
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, in fact I don't like the whole chichester's stuff. No, I HATE the whole chichester's stuff.
Yes, his vision of the radar sense was impressive, but what about the story ?

the black armour wasn't bad, but it didn't look what a devil should look ( thanks to McDaniel, DD seems to have a rat head ! ).
The whole Jack Battling story was infamous. For no reason ( yes, you wil say " Matt identity was exposed " but come on, who could believe that a blind lawyer can be a masked vigilante after what he and ben did in the end... ) Matt faked his death and become that Jack Battling.

What a terrible idea ! DD is about law and justice. Matt was and IS that, Jack Battling wasn't. I hope that Bendis has learned from this mistake.

Look at the whole chichester run : every episode, DD fight the villian of the week with some guest star ( the more guest star, the best the book is for D G ). Venom appeared one or two issue and disappeared after an unfinished fight that DD was near to win. Has this any sense ?

I am a huge Miller, Nocenti and now Bendis fan, but what chichester did nearly killed DD for me. It wasn't the same character and hasn't any interest.

DeMattis' "fix" was ridiculous, childish and stupid, Yes, but for what I have seen, it was impossible to bring back Matt Murdock and the red costume after what chichester did.

Have I forgotten something ? Oh Yes, chichester killed for no reason Glorianna O'Breen !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Kuljit Mithra
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1530
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the gael wrote:


Have I forgotten something ? Oh Yes, chichester killed for no reason Glorianna O'Breen !


Yes, that whole Kruel storyline was something to behold.

This timeframe, from after Humanity's Fathom (or Fathoms of Humanity if you prefer), was not a highlight of DD.

Changing editors, changing imprints... it's a wonder so many of us stuck through it.
_________________
Kuljit Mithra
www.manwithoutfear.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the gael wrote:

Have I forgotten something ? Oh Yes, chichester killed for no reason Glorianna O'Breen !


Didn't Alan Smithee kill her? I'll have to double check.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuljit Mithra
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1530
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forrest wrote:
the gael wrote:

Have I forgotten something ? Oh Yes, chichester killed for no reason Glorianna O'Breen !


Didn't Alan Smithee kill her? I'll have to double check.


Yes, you are both correct. Smile

http://www.manwithoutfear.com/messageboard/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=238
_________________
Kuljit Mithra
www.manwithoutfear.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the gael wrote:
" Matt identity was exposed " but come on, who could believe that a blind lawyer can be a masked vigilante after what he and ben did in the end... )


I think that's an interesting statement because if an event like the outing of DD occurred in the real world, tons of people would believe it! Look at the last US presidential election (and pretty much politics in general): so many people on either side would constantly site strange and difficult to support notions intended as an attack on the other side. People buy this stuff! (The masses aren't always logical.) Especially if you're living in the Marvel Universe, where Galactus and Silver Surfer duke it out in NYC, telepathic suggestion is real, and mutants of every kind can be found almost anywhere. The idea of a blind guy fighting crime doesn't seem so far fetched. People wouldn't just say, "He's blind! Duh!"

That is another problem with the "fix" to Chichester's final DD stories; Matt would have been hounded until the day he died with questions about being DD. This is an area where immediate-post-Chichester writers failed big time, but Bendis is shining. The way Bendis writes the impact of Matt's (second) outing as DD is exactly how it would happen!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuljit Mithra wrote:
Forrest wrote:
the gael wrote:

Have I forgotten something ? Oh Yes, chichester killed for no reason Glorianna O'Breen !


Didn't Alan Smithee kill her? I'll have to double check.


Yes, you are both correct. Smile

http://www.manwithoutfear.com/messageboard/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=238


Neat. I didn't know that. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuljit Mithra wrote:

Yes, that whole Kruel storyline was something to behold.

This timeframe, from after Humanity's Fathom (or Fathoms of Humanity if you prefer), was not a highlight of DD.

Changing editors, changing imprints... it's a wonder so many of us stuck through it.


I have to agree; I that wasn't the best of DD moments. I did like the writing, aside from the lame story.
I'm just glad that eventually we got Karl Kessel and Cary Nord. Those guys were great!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the gael
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
That is another problem with the "fix" to Chichester's final DD stories; Matt would have been hounded until the day he died with questions about being DD. This is an area where immediate-post-Chichester writers failed big time, but Bendis is shining. The way Bendis writes the impact of Matt's (second) outing as DD is exactly how it would happen!


Yes, Bendis did an amazing job. his story is so much more powerfull than the " fall from grace " storyline. Bendis rocks while chichester sucks.

Quote:
I'm just glad that eventually we got Karl Kessel and Cary Nord. Those guys were great!


Yes, Daredevil was fun to see with them. A good " old school DD "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Darediva
Wake Up


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1208
Location: Hell's Kitchen South, Arkansas, USA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuljit Mithra wrote:
the gael wrote:


Have I forgotten something ? Oh Yes, chichester killed for no reason Glorianna O'Breen !


Yes, that whole Kruel storyline was something to behold.

This timeframe, from after Humanity's Fathom (or Fathoms of Humanity if you prefer), was not a highlight of DD.

Changing editors, changing imprints... it's a wonder so many of us stuck through it.


When I identified myself as a hardcore Daredevil fan to Dan Buckley at Wizard World Texas, his first question was, "How long have you been reading Daredevil?" I told him from the beginning, sporadically at times, but I have nearly every issue now. His reply was, "You must be a true fan, you've stuck with him through some mighty awful stuff." Then he said there was some great stuff on the horizon.
_________________
Alice




Those who throw dirt merely lose ground.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Darediva wrote:

When I identified myself as a hardcore Daredevil fan to Dan Buckley at Wizard World Texas, his first question was, "How long have you been reading Daredevil?" I told him from the beginning, sporadically at times, but I have nearly every issue now. His reply was, "You must be a true fan, you've stuck with him through some mighty awful stuff." Then he said there was some great stuff on the horizon.


I'd like to see a book with silverage roots that hasn't had terrible times. No matter how big the character, it seems that strange, commercially based storylines or plain bad creators take hold. Check out Spider-Man's clone saga, Superman's death and rebirth (Red / Blue stuff), Batman's Knightfall (well, I've yet to read Knightfall, but it might have actually been done well), etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group