Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


DD Book Club: The Man Without Fear
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dimetre
Underboss


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1366
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This was a very strong issue. Matt is amazing in this issue, and Miller is probably the best writer to ever write his powers. I loved the junkies in this issue. The Kingpin is always fantastic under Miller's pen. I think my favourite moment in this issue is when Matt throws his club at the guard who's blowing bubblegum and listening to music. That's a fantastic Romita moment.

But it is the 90s, and it's Miller, so there is some craziness here. Did Matt kill those guys who were trying to steal from him once he got back to Hell's Kitchen? It certainly looks that way. It looks like he split their heads wide open. And since it's 90s Miller, why would I think otherwise?

I preferred it in the 80s when it would never occur to anyone, including Miller, that Matt would kill. In my mind, Matt can always rein himself in from killing.

I also liked the meeting between Matt and Foggy, but Miller always portrayed Foggy as something of a clown, who doesn't appear to offer much to the partnership. Here he has Foggy dozing while Matt uncovers the Stoelting vs. West decision (which, in the 80s, was something that Foggy discovered).

The page where Clay is blown up was well done, although I found myself imagining how much more powerful this page would have been drawn by Dave Mazzuchelli. I also thought the caption "It is to be his last thought," was an unusual bit of overwriting from Miller. I actually think the next panel would have been more powerful without that caption.

I also have no idea what Julio's motivation would have been for getting the children to sing. Is he a Sound of Music fan? The only reason for the children to sing is to give Matt something to hear. I don't get why Larks or Julio would want the children to sing.

But this is a better issue than the previous one. I find that Romita's art has gotten a little sloppier as this series goes on, although, as I stated earlier there are some great moments. And, again, Matt's shoes look great as he's jumping to get away from Larks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dimetre wrote:

I also have no idea what Julio's motivation would have been for getting the children to sing. Is he a Sound of Music fan? The only reason for the children to sing is to give Matt something to hear. I don't get why Larks or Julio would want the children to sing.


My read of this was always that the kids were singing out their own accord because they were scared and were trying to keep their hopes up. Larks just assumes Julio planned it and Julio takes the credit once he realizes Larks likes it.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually thought Mickey had spread the word to sing because she knew Matt had super hearing and was hoping he'd hear.

Dimetre wrote:

I also liked the meeting between Matt and Foggy, but Miller always portrayed Foggy as something of a clown, who doesn't appear to offer much to the partnership. Here he has Foggy dozing while Matt uncovers the Stoelting vs. West decision (which, in the 80s, was something that Foggy discovered).


Huh, I never realized it was the same case. I can't conceivably think of any scenario where the same case has application between a slum landlord and aggravated assault, murder, abduction, or whatever it was the Gladiator was charged with. I think it's a fun little reference. If you read The Man Without Fear first and then the original story (chronological order), you can see Foggy saying to Matt, "How could you have missed it? You're the one who first discovered the case."

I liked how Foggy was handled here. He isn't portrayed as a genius, but I don't think he's a bumbling idiot either. He's in the trenches fighting against lawyers with far more resources than him. They were working together long into the night (hence why he was asleep). I don't think it was meant to suggest apathy, just exhaustion.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Overlord
Paradiso


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 1095

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
Yeah, this is where things start to look a lot like a Miller greatest hits package. Stealing children off the street to sell into prostitution doesn't really fit within the Marvel Universe or Daredevil or even with the Kingpin's character really. It sure fits into Sin City though! As RGdesigner points out there are some pretty heavily recycled plot points here and the whole thing starts to feel like the best of Miller's Daredevil, Sin City and Batman all packed together.

Which probably makes sense if this was originally a script. If Miller was writing for the movies it stands to reason that he would fire all guns at once even if they didn't fit squarely within the Daredevil mythos.

Also agree with Mike Murdock's assessment of the law stuff. Prior to this I don't think anyone even tried to make sense of Matt's schooling and early career but all this is dead on.


This is one reason why I have trouble buying Man Without Fear as being canon, this scheme seems a little too evil for 616 Kingpin. It seems like something the Punisher Max version of Kingpin would do.

Miller's Kingpin in his original run was somewhat sympathetic and even in Born Again, Kingpin was pretty bad in that story, but his scheme in Man Without Fear is far worse then anything he did Born Again. He may have ruined Matt Murdock's life in that story, but Murdock is an adult and a super hero who has opposed him in the past, actively exploiting street children who have done nothing to him is a new low. Its the type crime that if it were in canon, it render Kingpin totally unsympathetic, any grey morality on his part would be forgotten under the weight of such a monstrous act.

I think if they adapt this plot to the Netflix, they would likely give it to Owl instead of Fisk and perhaps use it contrast how much worse Owl is to Fisk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DesignDevil
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 157
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
it renders Kingpin totally unsympathetic,


I've never found Fisk to be sympathetic at all. He is complex yes, but I remember Bendis wrote Fisk ordering the murder of an underlings family and the rape of his wife. Child porn and murder is the lowest of the low, but its not like the modern Kingpin isn't a despicable human being out for power and money, period.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Overlord
Paradiso


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 1095

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RGdesigner wrote:
Quote:
it renders Kingpin totally unsympathetic,


I've never found Fisk to be sympathetic at all. He is complex yes, but I remember Bendis wrote Fisk ordering the murder of an underlings family and the rape of his wife. Child porn and murder is the lowest of the low, but its not like the modern Kingpin isn't a despicable human being out for power and money, period.


And Brubaker wrote Fisk as being willing to adopt a Spanish family and treat them as his own flesh and blood, that was clearly an attempt to make him sympathetic, you are supposed to feel for him when they get murdered. Again I think Kingpin went too far in Man Without Fear, it seems a bit out of character for him. Making Kingpin too evil, robs him of any complexity. You as well replace him with the Punisher Max version of Kingpin.

You can't have a villain cross a certain line and still expect the audience to find him sympathetic or complex after a while. I think in Breaking Bad Walter White ended up crossing that line and his actions became more about himself then his family.

Bullseye is an unrepentant mass murderer, Purple Man and Mr. Fear are serial rapists, none of those characters are supposed to be sympathetic or complex and no one would buy it someone tried to write them that way at this point. Even Owl has become an unstable maniac recently. I think Kingpin should be a step above those guys in terms of morality, otherwise you may as well have all the DD villains engage in a puppy eating contest. I think Kingpin having some lines he won't cross he won't cross (like child exploitation) actually makes him stand out a bit from the usual pure evil psychopath that DD faces.

Again if they adopt this plot point to the Netflix series, I would rather have Owl do it then Fisk, considering they are trying to make Fisk sympathetic in that series.

I feel the same about the stories where Magneto becomes a genocidal manic or Doom decides to skin his old girlfriend alive and send Franklin Richards to Hell, not all villains have to be monsters to be compelling, some villains can have a little gray in them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 10:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RGdesigner wrote:
Quote:
it renders Kingpin totally unsympathetic,


I've never found Fisk to be sympathetic at all. He is complex yes, but I remember Bendis wrote Fisk ordering the murder of an underlings family and the rape of his wife. Child porn and murder is the lowest of the low, but its not like the modern Kingpin isn't a despicable human being out for power and money, period.


While it's hard to tell if Fisk has scruples, I felt Bendis's portrayal in Hardcore was a little out of character too. This is someone whose love of his wife convinces him to give up crime. Someone who teams up with Daredevil because a rival would cross the line and steal a man's wife (Micah Synn with Foggy's wife Deborah). Someone who adopted and cared for the daughter of a business partner he was murdering because it was his dying wish. Granted, it's possible only Vanessa really has that appeal. While Daredevil believed Fisk thought that crossed a line, there was no question that Fisk benefited from Daredevil fighting Micah instead of him. In addition, caring for Crazy Horse's daughter Maya clearly had strategic ends.

But, to me, it's that subtlety that works far better than the blunt cold line in Hardcore about ordering the rape and murder of someone's wife.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dimetre
Underboss


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1366
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike Murdock wrote:
While it's hard to tell if Fisk has scruples, I felt Bendis's portrayal in Hardcore was a little out of character too. This is someone whose love of his wife convinces him to give up crime. Someone who teams up with Daredevil because a rival would cross the line and steal a man's wife (Micah Synn with Foggy's wife Deborah). Someone who adopted and cared for the daughter of a business partner he was murdering because it was his dying wish. Granted, it's possible only Vanessa really has that appeal. While Daredevil believed Fisk thought that crossed a line, there was no question that Fisk benefited from Daredevil fighting Micah instead of him. In addition, caring for Crazy Horse's daughter Maya clearly had strategic ends.

But, to me, it's that subtlety that works far better than the blunt cold line in Hardcore about ordering the rape and murder of someone's wife.

I have to agree, again, with Mike Murdock. Fisk may be a villain, but he's a villain with standards. That's probably what allows readers to empathize with him from time to time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DesignDevil
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 157
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You guys aren't wrong on the points you are making. Not to bring another discussion into this thread, but this is why I'm in favor a "reboot". These characters have had so many different versions over the decades its silly.

Yes Kingpin has been loving man towards his wife and has tried to reform. He's also been a clown who bumps Spiderman with his belly. He's also been a cold blooded killer who doesn't care who dies in order to gain/maintain his power.

The Owl has been many things. When Waid recently used him he came across like a Scooby Do villain with his trap door. The whole time I was thinking about how in his last confrontation Matt stabbed him through the spine because he was getting ready to brutally murder (and possibly other things) Dakota. He'd been an unstable psychopath for the last decade.

Magneto has been hero at times. He's been a tragic figure who fights against a world he sees as unjust because of the tragic ends of his family and people. He's also been a genocidal maniac who sees humans as cattle to slaughter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think it's just that it's out of character for Kingpin but it just doesn't fit within the 616 Marvel U. Same with the other examples people are raised above. It's the Marvel Universe for heaven's sake. Every so often a writer goes to far to seem edgey and it just comes across tone deaf.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
admiralpetty
Flying Blind


Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 48
Location: Kalispell, MT

PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
I don't think it's just that it's out of character for Kingpin but it just doesn't fit within the 616 Marvel U. Same with the other examples people are raised above. It's the Marvel Universe for heaven's sake. Every so often a writer goes to far to seem edgey and it just comes across tone deaf.


To be honest, I don't think this story was written with the 616 Marvel U in mind, it never even really acknowledges the rest of the Marvel U, including other super heroes. I think it was written as an entertaining standalone origin tale with none of the strings attached that an in continuity tale would have to deal with(like another Miller classic The Dark Knight Returns). This story not only contradicts the Marvel U in several ways, but even stories that Miller had written himself during his original run on Daredevil. This story easily reads as an excellent script for a standalone Daredevil movie(which is what the script was originally intended to be).

I think the confusion on whether or not this story is canon can largely be attributed to writers on the main DD title who decided to take the bits they liked and incorporate them into their stories. But I still believe this was always intended to be a standalone tale outside of the main series continuity. I don't blame the other writers for taking some of the best bits of this story, but I don't believe that this story should be judged on whether or not it lines up with the main DD continuity. There are things from this tale that will never be adopted by writers in the main continuity, namely the Kingpin's atrocious actions involving children, as well as the portrayal of Elektra's younger days.

I personally liked this story's portrayal of the Kingpin. I never really viewed the Kingpin as a particularly gray character. In Miller's original story, Vanessa was the only thing that allowed Fisk to keep his monstrous side in check and allow his human side to show. The real tragedy of that story is that if things hadn't gone down the way they did with Vanessa, I think the Kingpin had the potential to live happily ever after with Vanessa in Japan. Once Vanessa was out of the picture we see the Kingpin return to his monstrous ways once again, her return by Daredevil showed he still had some humanity, but this was still stunted by the fact that she was basically comatose.

Even more tragically, once she did recover and saw what the Kingpin had become again, she left him with the doctor and his wife whom helped heal her(as excellently told in Daredevil: Love and War). This was, in my opinion anyway, when Kingpin truly lost his humanity and became the monstrous character that we see in Born Again. By the time that story was written, we see how diabolically evil the Kingpin really had become, not just by the way he reveled in destroying a good man, but also by the way he was completely unconcerned about the collateral damage that unleashing a character like Nuke in Hells Kitchen would cause.

The Kingpin at that point was no longer a sympathetic character, and he wasn't really supposed to be at that point. He is still a tragic character in some respects, but the point he arrives at in Bendis' run on the series doesn't really strike me as out of character given everything that had occurred up to that point. Frankly I could also see the character from the comics resorting to the awful things he does in the series, but that kind of storytelling doesn't really fit within the main 616 universe, and it shouldn't be put there. But for the purpose of this story as a standalone tale, I think it fits just fine and goes to show what a horrible character the Kingpin of Crime really is.

As for my score of this issue, I would give it 5 out of 5, really strong stuff throughout the whole issue, nice to finally see the more heroic less vengeance driven side of Matt come out in this issue. I think the other posters have brought out most of the points that I loved about this issue at this point in the discussion. As for the thugs Matt beats up at the beginning of the issue, I don't think they are dead(especially given something that Matt does in the next issue), but I could see how it could be a little hard to discern based on Romita's art in those panels. I also enjoyed how it really showcased the seamy belly of the underworld in the actions from the junkies on up to the Kingpin himself, just really terrible people in really terrible situations, showcasing how desperate people can become in those sort of surroundings and circumstances.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Last one. I'm posting it a bit early because of the big game (TM) tomorrow:

Issue 5:


Due Feb. 7

Also, don't forget to go to the other thread to help decide what we should do next.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dimetre
Underboss


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1366
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The bulk of this issue feels like we're inside Sin City, or in an issue of Punisher, with its extreme and unrelenting violence, but I feel Miller went and justified it all with the following caption accompanying a cityscape on one of the last pages.

"Daredevil. It was in that one moment of cold purpose -- that moment when Mickey's life hung in the balance -- that moment when the wild part of him fond itself calm and clear -- that moment that Matt Murdock became a man -- it was in that one moment that the name came back to him."

Up until this moment, Daredevil was beating the crap out of people, stabbing people and blowing things up. At the moment to which Miller refers, he was calmer, presenting Larks with options, and repeating that he doesn't want to kill him. That's when the man we all know and love was fully formed.

Or maybe Miller was aware that this level of ultra-violence wasn't compatible with the character he helped define a dozen or so years earlier, but hell, he loved writing this stuff in 1993, and he had to find a way to justify it in a Daredevil story.

I liked that Miller had Matt batting away bullets, just like he drew way back in #159, in July 1979. I enjoyed the reappearance of Stick at the end of the story.

Reading this issue by itself in 2015, I'm not sure it feels like Daredevil anymore. You would never think that this guy in a dark track suit and mask was Daredevil if you only picked up this issue. It's not until after Larks is dead and we start reading about how "the boy from Hell's Kitchen has come home," that it feels like Matt again. Prior to that, as I said earlier, it feels more like Punisher or Miller's Sin City.

That final double-page spread used to be my computer wallpaper for many years. This mini-series represents John Romita Jr. at his peak, in my opinion. I will say, however, that this issue contains his sloppiest artwork of the series, and is closest to his current level. Matt's shoes failed to enthrall me this issue.

A very strong ending to this issue. I would give this one a three and a half.

This trade paperback was one of the first books I picked up when I got back into comics in the 90s. I was completely hooked, so it did it's job at the time. It was interesting to revisit it now that I have read so many more stories about Matt Murdock from so many more writers.

I think as Miller continued to descend into his fetish for extreme violence as the 90s drew on, he lost his grip on certain characters. I think this series proves that he know longer had any idea who Elektra was, and this was a character he created. Most people would concede that by 1993, he could no longer write Batman well. (Try reading Spawn/Batman from the same year.) Matt Murdock is different. This series stands as Miller's final word on Matt Murdock, and I think it contains some of Matt's finest moments. This character always brought out the best in Miller. Yet, when I read this final issue today, with it's extreme carnage, while it felt true to Miller, it also showed me that he was beginning to lose his grip on a character that was previously second nature to him. It's too bad Miller became so angry about Fall From Grace, and swore to never write for Marvel again. You have to wonder if he might have had a few more gems in him before bottoming completely out like he has in recent years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dragonbat
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 15 Jan 2014
Posts: 144
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't read Sin City or Punisher, but I have read Batman Year One. And I've noticed similarities. Hero on first 'real' night out in disguise but not the costume he'll eventually wear? Check. Arrested and escaping from police cruiser? Check. Seriously injured, losing blood? Check. (Though Matt saves the day instead of making it to the manor study and debating whether to call Alfred or bleed to death.)

Still... I continue to be in awe of the pacing. Loved the end bit. Everything from Matt laughing at the idea of going back to Boston to "God only knows what it looks like" really shone for me.

I will say that the art in the first couple of pages made Matt look a bit too bulky, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I loved this series when it came out. Maybe it's because I was younger or because, at the time, I thought Miller was the greatest writer who ever lived but my love has definitely waned a bit.

Why is Matt begging Larks not to make him kill him? Matt kills those other two guards at the drop of a hat and all the sudden he doesn't want to kill Larks who is clearly way more evil? It doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

Also, Matt's sudden indifference to killing messes up some other stuff too. I mean, if he's fine with killing if necessary why doesn't he show up armed? Or why doesn't he arm himself once he's out there killing dudes?

Also, growing up on Nocenti, JRJR's Daredevil is my Daredevil. That said, the man really can't draw kids and really can't draw female kids so why there is a full page spash of Micky is beyond me.

Still, classic series.

Dragonbat wrote:

Still... I continue to be in awe of the pacing.


You should go back and read older Miller stuff. He basically introduces Elektra, Stick, The Hand, etc. in one issue. All Marvel/comics used to be like that. Days of Future Past is two issues.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group