Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


Radar questions – what do you think?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:36 pm    Post subject: Radar questions – what do you think? Reply with quote

I just deleted my post from the FAQ radar thread since it was just way too obnoxious, but I’d like to get people’s opinions on a few radar-related things that I’ve thought about (yes, I think too much, I know it’s not good for me). First of all, I’d like to make it clear that I’m not even talking about what the heck the radar sense actually is, since it’s been described at least a couple of different ways, but more about what it does and how Matt actually uses it. So what do you think about this, and is there anything you’ve reacted to? I’m genuinly curious to hear what people think, because I frankly have no idea.

Is the radar sense always active?
I’ve noticed that input from this sense has often been described as an afterthought in a kind of “Oh, I hear footsteps coming towards me and now (suddenly?) my radar is picking him up.” Of course, this could be due to the range of this sense not being very impressive (which would be explained in part by the inverse square law, but I’m not going too geek out completely). There have also been times when he’s said things like “I don’t even need my radar sense [for one thing or another].” Then there are the times he talks about actively “probing” his surroundings or “reaching out” or something like that which I guess means he can pull it back in, or what…? In a way it would make sense for it not to be “on” all the time like when he’s sleeping or sitting down.

Does using it require active concentration/attention?
This is tied in to the question above, but is a little different. While I doubt it would take much effort for him to get a decent “view”of his surroundings it does seem like he actually has to pay some amount of attention to what he’s doing. Why else would he have “radar problems” when he’s exposed to too much – essentially unrelated – stimuli? Hey, dump him in the perfume department at Macy’s during the big shopping weekend after Thanksgiving and he might actually need that cane…

Is the radar sense better at picking out dense objects?
It seems to me that he has always been very good at picking out guns, and knives and things like that while at the same time basically being unable to “see” faces or facial expressions (at least according to Frank Miller and most other writers). Like he might be able to recognize someone by overall shape and movements but doesn’t really know what they look like. Real radars (if that’s what his is) are much better at picking up metal and very dense objects as well, so this makes sense I suppose, but has anyone else thought about this?
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rgj
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:
First of all, I’d like to make it clear that I’m not even talking about what the heck the radar sense actually is, since it’s been described at least a couple of different ways,


The radar is what it is. It HAS been defined. Pick up the DD ominbus and it will tell you EXACTLY what it is (yes, Virginia, there is a radar and it works with waves generated in Matt's brain and the waves are emitted from his mind).

The only time that someone else put a definition to HOW it works, it was, the idiot of all idiots, Mark Steven Johnson. And, some of the post movie DD writers have really gotten confused (ie. Bendis) because of it. And, if a writer is confuesed then he just doesn't know Daredevil.

There is no mention if it's "always on", but I would have to say that it makes sense that it WOULD always be "on." But, remember, Matt has to actively focus on his radar, in order to "see" with it. Any stimulus (ie. loud sound, bad smell) may hinder Matt from focusing and cause him to lose the images coming to him. So, yes, like ALL his other senses he must focus on the radar.

I think it also makes sense that Matt's radar is better picking up solid objects, since the objects must be concrete enough to have the radar waves bounce off them and reflect back to Matt.

rgj
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rgj wrote:
jumonji wrote:
First of all, I’d like to make it clear that I’m not even talking about what the heck the radar sense actually is, since it’s been described at least a couple of different ways,


The radar is what it is. It HAS been defined. Pick up the DD ominbus and it will tell you EXACTLY what it is (yes, Virginia, there is a radar and it works with waves generated in Matt's brain and the waves are emitted from his mind).

I don't usually get cocky, but I'll make an exception here, just for you. Wink

1) I have actually read every single issue of Daredevil and all of the sources you've quoted in the FAQ thread and others. Some of the definitions that you referenced in that thread actually contradict each other.
2) I'm a trained scientist. "Waves," as a definition, doesn't cut it for me. (What kinds of waves, what frequency, intensity etc?) That's why I refrained from even getting into the mechanics of the radar to only focus my questions on what it actually does, not how it does it.

rgj wrote:
The only time that someone else put a definition to HOW it works, it was, the idiot of all idiots, Mark Steven Johnson. And, some of the post movie DD writers have really gotten confused (ie. Bendis) because of it. And, if a writer is confuesed then he just doesn't know Daredevil.

*sigh* I'm not going to bother with this at all except to say that I personally think Bendis's version of the radar is the most ill-defined of them all, and that the one in the movie actually makes more sense. That is not how it's been defined traditionally (I know). I have actually read all the same sources you have, which is why I asked questions regarding people's general impressions of things that haven't specifically been addressed.

rgj wrote:
There is no mention if it's "always on", but I would have to say that it makes sense that it WOULD always be "on." But, remember, Matt has to actively focus on his radar, in order to "see" with it. Any stimulus (ie. loud sound, bad smell) may hinder Matt from focusing and cause him to lose the images coming to him. So, yes, like ALL his other senses he must focus on the radar.

Thank you. This is an example of a respectful response to what I was actually asking. What you are describing supports my gut instinct as well.

rgj wrote:
I think it also makes sense that Matt's radar is better picking up solid objects, since the objects must be concrete enough to have the radar waves bounce off them and reflect back to Matt.

Again. Thank you for answering this. It makes sense to me that he would have a harder time "seeing" soft things like people, and an easier time making out dense objects.

Now let's take a deep breath. We're all friends here, right? Wink And for future reference, assuming that people aren't idiots is always a nice way to approach a situation... It's more fun that way.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rgj
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, and I wasn't even trying to offend. Really. If you feel I was being rude, I apologize.

As for wanting "waves" to be defined because you are a scientist, the book entry mentions something about Matt's brain and the "electromagnetic spectrum."

I don't know the frequency of these waves, but it is obviously a frequency that Matt can sense.

The problem with MSJ and Bendis's definiton (Bendis's includes the sum of ALL his senses) is that Matt has lost his radar before in the comic yet still retained all his heightened senses.

rgj
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rgj wrote:
Wow, and I wasn't even trying to offend. Really. If you feel I was being rude, I apologize.

Well, that's good to know and apology accepted.

rgj wrote:
As for wanting "waves" to be defined because you are a scientist, the book entry mentions something about Matt's brain and the "electromagnetic spectrum."

The reason I think the traditional definition is lacking is because the particular frequency really would have a huge impact on what he can and can't make out and what kinds of materials he can and can't penetrate with his radar (okay, that sounds weird...).

With the way different writers have portrayed it there's very little consistency. That's natural, I suppose because no one has ever sat down and said "this is the smallest amount of detail he can resolve." Ann Nocenti (who I personally think is a good writer, but wrote a terrible Matt Murdock) said that the radar was more accurate than sight and could pick up dust particles. Seriously, if he would walk around picking up dust particles he'd be hit with constant noise. A traditional real-life radar usually transmits in the mid to high-end of the microwave portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, and the MUH description (being able to resolve a three inch pole at over eighty feet with input from his other senses) is actually pretty consistent with the resolution you would get using that part of the spectrum.

If you, just for the fun of it, convert the MUH description to how visual acuity is usually measured, that would put his radar acuity at just below the legal blindness limit of 20/200 (it's a two-step calculation that takes less than five minutes to do). For those who think that this is unrealistically bad, it should be noted that most people with 20/200 vision have few if any mobility issues, and the ones they do have are usually related to crappy depth perception. With DD's radar sense being mainly a proximity sense, as you've mentioned, he should have excellent depth perception despite not "seeing" very well generally. Another way of expressing it would be that he'd be able to count how many fingers someone is holding up from a distance of no greater than 40 feet. People with 20/20 vision can do the same thing from 400 feet, but for someone who can't technically see anything, I'd say that's pretty darn good (and certainly good enough to account for most of the stuff he has been "seeing" throughout the history of the book, not counting some obvious no-prize worthy stuff).

Okay, I didn't mean to turn this into a geek fest. I'm just saying that that would constitute a definition in my book. "Mid to high-end microwave portion of the EM spectrum" is a solid defintion, whereas "waves" is open to all kinds of interpretations which writers can do whatever they want with (such as Chichester and the cockroach imprint you mentioned, which really should have been beyond what he can "see," especially with Chichester himself often emphasizing that the radar sense is very crude compared to normal vision).

I understand that you weren't trying to offend, just as I'm not trying to hit anyone over the head with my techno-babble (but, hey, I love math), but I do feel that your reaction to my post may have been a knee-jerk reaction to what you perceived as someone questioning the classic defintion of the radar sense when I really did no such thing. Okay, that's it. It's 1.30 am and I'm going to bed. Wink
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers


Last edited by jumonji on Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:35 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rgj
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, as I said, many writers (pre movie) have fiddled with the extent/range of Matt's radar. I don't think that Matt should be able to "see" the fine details of a crushed roach, but if Chichester says "Well, Matt was really concentrating and focusing on that image, concentrating on the waves in that direction.", I'm fine with it.

I just don't like when writers say that Matt's radar is the sum of his senses (or that little Gazoo over his shoulder is telling him what's around him). That would be a prime example of how this writer doesn't really know our hero. It would show that he got his DD education while watching a terrible movie.

rgj


That's right Matty! There's a hot little number at five o'clock!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rgj wrote:
I just don't like when writers say that Matt's radar is the sum of his senses (or that little Gazoo over his shoulder is telling him what's around him). That would be a prime example of how this writer doesn't really know our hero.

I agree with you. I liked Bendis, but his radar made no sense whatsoever. On the one hand, it seems logical that Matt would use all his senses to get a good idea of what everything is around him in a kind of "blocky square shape + smells like plastic and food = microwave" and "big blocky shape with a distictive hum and a smell of refrigerants = refrigerator" sense, but identifying what objects are and just plain picking them up are different things.

Having said that, I think that Brubaker writes Matt's radar (and other senses) really well. All the senses come across as appropriately powerful without being absurd (in that "oh now I'm picking up a mosquito three blocks away" sense).

And one more thing, I really liked the Director's Cut of the movie, so sue me (though not in this thread).

rgj wrote:
[referencing image above]
That's right Matty! There's a hot little number at five o'clock!

Hey, when writers say that "my radar describes it for me" maybe they mean that literally... Wink

Now, to anyone else out there who wants to weigh in on the questions I played around with in the original post (and don't want to read mine and rgj's lengthy exchange), here they are again:

1) Is the radar sense always active?
2) Does using it require active concentration/attention?
3) Is the radar sense better at picking out dense objects (like metals versus people)?

What's your impression?
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
pbblair
Flying Blind


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I say that it's always on. That's why it's such a problem is it acts up... it would be like if your ears were ringing--- you can't turn it off.

I do think that it can be concentrated, like sight. Just because my eyes are open does not mean that I'm focused on the correct thing. In fact, I may be daydreaming and distracted from that sense altogether. But when I focus, I can. In the case of the radar, though, it can be focused much better than regular old eyesight.

I DO NOT think that the radar should have trouble with faces, even if they're not in the line-of-sight. Radar "reflections" should be good enough for that, even if it's not quite as accurate as a direct "look" at the person. He would surely have trouble with skin and hair color, and therefore moles and whatnot, so he's miss out on characteristics that sighted people would use as "recognition shortcuts," so he's probably be more familiar with bone structures. From his perspective, there are probably more effective ways of identifying people than their faces anyway, and we've seen him mention those before. Sighted people use faces as a crutch--- blind people in general have numerous ways of telling who it is, depending on their familiarity with you.

I DO think that Matt can't "see" into sealed containers, since to my knowledge we've never seen him do that, even when it would have been handy. As I recall (I didn't do a search), rgj disagreed on that point when I raised it in defense that Matt wouldn't have known that Foggy wasn't in his coffin. I think he could probably focus on neighboring rooms and let his radar bounce around under the doors and whatnot, but he's get a pretty blurry image, in which case he'd be better of focusing his hearing just to see whose heartbeats are there. (Detecting the shape of a ninja-in-hiding would probably take way more effort.)

Have we ever seen DD sit on a rooftop and concentrate his radar on finding a SHAPE? I can recall him concentrating his hearing, but that's different. That would be a good guide for just how focused and how intense that sense can be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for chiming in! Interesting points. Here's what I think (long post again...), and let's see if we can get a nice debate going.

pbblair wrote:
I say that it's always on. That's why it's such a problem is it acts up... it would be like if your ears were ringing--- you can't turn it off.

So you're essentially saying that it's not only on, but he's "seeing" all the time and when it acts up it's like double vision or something? Just checking, here. To clarify to anyone who's just joining in, the alternative explanation we have going right now (courtesy of rgj) is that it's always "on," but he has to actively focus on it ("listen" to it) in order to generate any kind of image.

pbblair wrote:
In the case of the radar, though, it can be focused much better than regular old eyesight.

I'm not sure what you mean by this exactly. I've always figured that the radar sense does have some bells and whistles that deliver things that natural sight can't such as a 360 degree "visual" field and "seeing" through walls (though that's an iffy concept to me). I also think that his depth perception is probably much better than most people's because he can (probably) almost literally feel the distance between himself and different objects. Aside from that though, seeing normally should win out in nearly every situation. In fact, statements like "he can see better than all of us" (which I read in some other forum somewhere) are kind of a pet peeve of mine. I can kind of see what people might mean by that, but it's a faulty premise. Just the fact that he can't see color is a huge disadvantage (yes, seriously), and Ann Nocenti is the only writer I can think of who's said that his radar sense (by itself) is more accurate than sight. I'd say it bumps him up from totally blind to partially sighted.

pbblair wrote:
I DO NOT think that the radar should have trouble with faces, even if they're not in the line-of-sight. Radar "reflections" should be good enough for that, even if it's not quite as accurate as a direct "look" at the person. He would surely have trouble with skin and hair color, and therefore moles and whatnot, so he's miss out on characteristics that sighted people would use as "recognition shortcuts," so he's probably be more familiar with bone structures. From his perspective, there are probably more effective ways of identifying people than their faces anyway, and we've seen him mention those before. Sighted people use faces as a crutch--- blind people in general have numerous ways of telling who it is, depending on their familiarity with you.

Hmm, I think there are two sides to this. First there's what writers have been doing where most (but not all) seem to be in the "needs to actually touch a person's face to get a good idea of what they look like" corner (which, interestingly, includes Nocenti...Wink). The other side is what happens if we, for the sake of argument, stick with the idea that his radar really is a bona fide radar and just look at that. The problem would be that some things would reflect back all or nearly all of the energy whereas some materials would absorb most of it and send back very little (and some materials would let much of it though). My guess would be that the soft tissue of the face absorbs a lot more of the energy than it sends back out. In this case he might get some info from bone structure though, as you mentioned. The other problem is resolution. Radar is mostly used for picking up really big objects and light waves are better at resolving small things (depending on the exact frequency of the radar, light is at least ten times better), so lots of things would probably seem indistinct. I don't necessarily think that Matt's "vison" is particularly blurry, but it would probably have much less definition to it than natural sight, and that's how it's often been drawn as well. But hey, just my two cents... Smile

pbblair wrote:
I DO think that Matt can't "see" into sealed containers, since to my knowledge we've never seen him do that, even when it would have been handy. As I recall (I didn't do a search), rgj disagreed on that point when I raised it in defense that Matt wouldn't have known that Foggy wasn't in his coffin. I think he could probably focus on neighboring rooms and let his radar bounce around under the doors and whatnot, but he's get a pretty blurry image, in which case he'd be better of focusing his hearing just to see whose heartbeats are there. (Detecting the shape of a ninja-in-hiding would probably take way more effort.)

If we're going with the "it's a real radar thing" again, I totally agree with you. I always thought the idea that the radar can penetrate solid objects to be iffy. Not that certain frequencies can't penetrate certain materials, but it would then bounce off something and go back out again and there shouldn't be much signal left. I also totally agree that other ways of determining something like how many people are in the next room make much more sense. As for the Foggy in the coffin thing (I came late to the party and missed that debate), I think the idea that he should have known it wasn't Foggy is silly. He would have to penetrate the coffin and pick out a shape that (in my opinion) he shouldn't be particularly good at "seeing" even when it's right in front of him.

pbblair wrote:
Have we ever seen DD sit on a rooftop and concentrate his radar on finding a SHAPE? I can recall him concentrating his hearing, but that's different. That would be a good guide for just how focused and how intense that sense can be.

I think we may have, but that would be another one of those little things that wouldn't make complete sense. What I think he can do (and has done if I'm not mistaken) is track a shape he's identified by other means. I think one reason he wouldn't use his radar much from a great distance is that the signal should be really faint. One advantage your Mr average sighted non-superhero has over him is the fact that the whole world is lit up from everywhere (thank you sun!). During the day, there's light everywhere. DD, on the other hand, has to bring his own "light" source to the party which I guess means that it would be like walking around in complete darkness with a light bulb on your head. The problem here is that the intensity of any such signal coming from a point source (like his head) would taper off pretty quickly according to the famous inverse square law in physics (my inner geek is loving this, can you tell?). It says that for each time you double the distance, the intensity is diminished by a factor of four, meaning that at a distance of something like one hundred meters, the "light" intensity would be one ten thousandth of what it would be at one meter. So, basically, it would make sense for him not to be able to "see" very far ahead of him even when he can make out his immediate surroundings pretty well. It would get "dark" pretty quickly. How quickly would depend on the intensity of the signal (of which we have no idea), but we are talking about a human brain here and not the Hubble telescope. His other senses would probably have a much better range, and he should be able to get much more information from them.

Okay, I'm all geeked out. I know the whole "analyzing superhero powers in comic books" is a futile endevour, but if anything I think all this illustrates just how much the radar really hasn't been defined very well at all. Opinions, comments? (Oh God, I should really be working right now...)
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
harryhausen
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 129
Location: U$A

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi, jumonji and co. I think this is a great thread. I’ve always been interested in Matt’s senses as they’re his, you know, super-power! Too often it seems that it’s just a collection of pseudo-scientific nonsense that allows writers to compensate for the blindness, more or less.

First, to answer the questions:

1. Yes, I think the radar sense is always active.
2. I like the previous poster’s (pbblair?) analogy about eyesight. Yes, it requires concentration and attention, perhaps on par with how one concentrates on one’s eyesight.
3. I would think that the radar would be much better at picking up dense objects. I think it would likely even be better at picking up stationary objects. Not to say that he has trouble with moving things (like the countless times he’s evaded projectiles of every sort), but I can imagine that a flagpole would be easier to distinguish than a flag flapping in the breeze (which I envision as having some sort of fuzziness to it).

I know that lots of people have done lots of different things with the senses. And I’ve not read them all. But here are my (purely subjective) feelings:

The coolest part of the radar is the 360 degree nature of it. Lots of artists draw DD turning his head toward sounds and whatnot (and I can understand some reasons why he might do that), but I liked the way Maleev would show him doing things – knocking out Sammy Silke or smashing the Owl’s camera – without even turning around, emphasizing that he “sees” in 360 degrees.

I’ve always imagined that the senses are a constant, bewildering flood of information (as seen in some of the depictions of Matt getting used to them at first, as well as some of the times it has gone haywire) that Matt controls with great effort. Like living with some intense pain. I imagine that he has to filter out all sorts of stuff all the time and that it requires exhausting mental control. To that end, I’ve always thought that his overall impression of the world is the sum of these miraculous senses. Like you said before, jumonji, the idea of ‘refrigerator’ could be represented by the radar outline thereof, the smell of the chemicals/machinery/food, the sounds of the machinery, the feeling of the moving air, etc. All inextricably tied together. In fact, Matt wouldn’t need to isolate which sense was providing what info unless one of them wasn’t working (as we’ve seen before). Maybe the same way we think, ‘It’s a nice day!’ without specifically cataloging the smell of flowers or the feeling of the sun or a balmy breeze? A collective impression. Note that I am not implying that his radar is the sum of his senses, just his overall impression of any object/situation.

Lastly (and I’ve mentioned this elsewhere), I’ve always imagined that Matt could improve his “filters” of the senses. Probably not the radar, but the other senses. The analogy I used was that of a musician improving his or her ear, beginning to make sense of dense and unusual music (like Webern/Ligeti/Nono, etc.) and hearing new beauty in the foreign tones as years pass. I imagine that Matt gets a flood of info and has been honing his ability to filter and process it. Not improvement to the organs of sense, but the opening of neural pathways as he gains ever more experience with these crazy senses. To that end, I think it would be reasonable for his use of the senses to grow and change, be refined, over time. Of course, that’s a slippery slope for writers.

Oh, and back on-topic, I have always imagined (in my own, non-isotope-affected brain – unless … wait, are drugs an isotope? The government sure trucks them through my neighborhood …) that he gets largely outlined impressions from the radar. A sense of depth, of course, from the various contours, but not details. No eyelashes, no sense of where the hairline begins, etc. His ability to really specifically recognize people would definitely come from the other senses. Of course, he could be great at picking up and identifying outlines that he has seen before. One of the reasons I like this approach is I think it makes it more intense to imagine a guy doing what DD does in a world of crazy silhouettes, more or less. Then add the other, intense details from the remaining senses, and it’s like he gets a picture of the world with the “middle” removed: he gets silhouettes and basic shapes, like a sighted person might get from a great distance, and then he gets the sort of olfactory and auditory details that a sighted person would get from being very close to something. It makes for a wild, claustrophobic image to me. And would make head-bustin’ in an alley just over-the-top intense!

Wow, that’s a long post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

harryhausen wrote:
Hi, jumonji and co. I think this is a great thread. I’ve always been interested in Matt’s senses as they’re his, you know, super-power! Too often it seems that it’s just a collection of pseudo-scientific nonsense that allows writers to compensate for the blindness, more or less.

Well, hi back at ya! Very Happy Glad you're enjoying the thread. I (quite obviously) enjoy discussing the senses stuff too, since they make him such a unique a hero, and the interplay between the blindness and the other senses really makes his a very exotic world that blows the mind and awakens the comic book scientist in all of us (well, me anyway).

harryhausen wrote:

1. Yes, I think the radar sense is always active.
2. I like the previous poster’s (pbblair?) analogy about eyesight. Yes, it requires concentration and attention, perhaps on par with how one concentrates on one’s eyesight.

Here's one idea I just thought of, so let's see what you guys think of it. Some general background first, just to let you know where I'm coming from: In its very first incarnation, the radar sense wasn't described as a "visual" sense at all, but as a purely tactile one. Stan Lee described it as a tingling sensation, which would presumably get more intense the closer DD came to an obstacle, letting him know exactly where it was. As time went by in the comics, this was (rather quickly) more or less reimagined to be some kind of built-in vision prosthetic, for lack of a better word. To what extent the experience of the radar sense approaches actually seeing (though it would be a limited kind of sight in the sense that it lacks light and color information), or whether it has more tactile properties like feeling the air getting denser or something, no one seems to know, but I guess it depends on the writer. Miller had his "like touching everything at once" interpretation and Bru seems to use the word "feel" a lot for the radar. My theory would be that the radar is always on in the sense that he can always feel something coming towards him, or an object getting closer as he approaches it, but that he might have to pay a little more attention to it to synthesize any form of image from it (going with rgj's interpretation). I would imagine this to be analogous to looking at those 3D images consisting of a bunch of dots that suddenly jump out at you when you look at them just the right way. This isn't very hard to do once you learn how to do it, but something like this would also explain why he'd get very little useful information from the radar when distracted and why he would need to actively "probe" his surroundings in some way without necessarily crashing into out-of-place furniture when completely relaxed. Okay, just an idea.

harryhausen wrote:
3. I would think that the radar would be much better at picking up dense objects. I think it would likely even be better at picking up stationary objects. Not to say that he has trouble with moving things (like the countless times he’s evaded projectiles of every sort), but I can imagine that a flagpole would be easier to distinguish than a flag flapping in the breeze (which I envision as having some sort of fuzziness to it).

I think you may be on to something here. Like you said, projectiles shouldn't be a problem, but I think it's been mentioned somewhere that he has problems with big crowds in part because of everyone constantly moving around (that and they make a lot of noise). In general though, a radar should have a heck of a time picking up a moving flag, for all kinds of reasons (I even suspect the signal might go right through it because of the longer wavelength).

His dislike of big crowds kind of makes you wonder what avoidance behaviours he'd exhibit generally, like when he tells Lily Lucca that parties give him a head ache... And he apparently hates the subway too, but I think that's more of a noise and stink problem. Wink

harryhausen wrote:
The coolest part of the radar is the 360 degree nature of it. Lots of artists draw DD turning his head toward sounds and whatnot (and I can understand some reasons why he might do that), but I liked the way Maleev would show him doing things – knocking out Sammy Silke or smashing the Owl’s camera – without even turning around, emphasizing that he “sees” in 360 degrees.

I remember Chichester commenting on the head-turning thing, saying that it was part reflex from when he could see (which makes sense), and part pretense so that no one would pick up on the fact that he really doesn't.

harryhausen wrote:
I’ve always imagined that the senses are a constant, bewildering flood of information (as seen in some of the depictions of Matt getting used to them at first, as well as some of the times it has gone haywire) that Matt controls with great effort. Like living with some intense pain. I imagine that he has to filter out all sorts of stuff all the time and that it requires exhausting mental control. To that end, I’ve always thought that his overall impression of the world is the sum of these miraculous senses.

I totally agree. I think depicting DD's use of his senses as the equivalent of walking into a lit room is a mistake and I'm glad to see that Bru isn't doing that. It makes sense for it to be more of an instinctual interpretive process. Something he's extremely skilled at, but which still requires at least some amount of effort. It makes it more impressive and makes him come off as more disciplined.

harryhausen wrote:
Lastly (and I’ve mentioned this elsewhere), I’ve always imagined that Matt could improve his “filters” of the senses. [...] Of course, that’s a slippery slope for writers.

I see what you mean and I agree to an extent. On the one hand it would make sense for him to be able to do so. What I'm less sure of is whether he could do this beyond what he has most likely already done. I mean he must have lived in his own little version of reality for twenty years or something, and while I imagine that it must have taken him quite a while to get used to it and learn to identify and make sense of everything, this ability would probably have maxed out by now after many years of superheroics. But I can imagine him learning new sounds and scents and things like that (although he should have been exposed to most of them by now), and use that in creative ways.

As for what writers do, it really is a slippery slope because you run the risk of having the powers become overly absurd. I guess most of you know how I feel about that reading computer screens by touch thing, by now. Rolling Eyes *sigh* (Though that idea was apparently inconspicuously abandoned pretty quickly) What I like about DD's senses, for the most part, is that while they obviously push the limits of human biology most of them don't actually violate the laws of physics (that much). Things like that computer screen thing actually pretty much does though. To me it's about as weird as saying "Oh, and by the way, he can also read minds now." There is also the issue of removing the blindness (and the vulnerability of his heightened senses) as factors that might occasionally get him into trouble. You don't want to remove Superman's kryptonite and this is pretty much the same thing.

(I like how some of his better "blind moments" have demonstrated his cunning mind (a valuable asset in any superhero's arsenal). The one that comes to mind is from some issue from the mid-100's of vol 1 where he finds a key card and someone swipes it through a machine and the adress comes up on a screen. With no one actually reading it out loud, he asks "Are you sure there is such an address?" to which someone answers "13 Wall Street? Of course!" Laughing)

harryhausen wrote:
Oh, and back on-topic, I have always imagined [...] that he gets largely outlined impressions from the radar. A sense of depth, of course, from the various contours, but not details. No eyelashes, no sense of where the hairline begins, etc. His ability to really specifically recognize people would definitely come from the other senses.

Agreed. To the extent that people "look" like anything, I imagine that they would be really generic looking. I honestly have no idea where the idea of DD "seeing" well comes from. Let's face it, he's got a whole host of impressive powers and he's a formidable fighter with incredible skills, but I would not want him as the designated driver for a night on the town, nor would I let him operate on me (though I imagine he'd be a great diagnostician actually). Even if you were to amp up the acuity of the radar to levels beyond natural sight I still bet Foggy could track down a book at the book store ten times faster than Matt (without asking for directions). Not seeing color or being able to read anything you're not physically touching does not constitute seeing well. Not changing my mind on that one...

harryhausen wrote:
One of the reasons I like this approach is I think it makes it more intense to imagine a guy doing what DD does in a world of crazy silhouettes, more or less. Then add the other, intense details from the remaining senses, and it’s like he gets a picture of the world with the “middle” removed: he gets silhouettes and basic shapes, like a sighted person might get from a great distance, and then he gets the sort of olfactory and auditory details that a sighted person would get from being very close to something. It makes for a wild, claustrophobic image to me. And would make head-bustin’ in an alley just over-the-top intense!

Wow! Just wow... What a great description. I love it! Very Happy

harryhausen wrote:
Wow, that’s a long post.

Yeah, but I think I got you beat. Wink
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rgj
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a reminder, Matt's "radar" is also "sonar" like.

Matt can "see" underwater. This was first stated in Lee's initial run.

I don't know if you know this, but Dolphins (who use different frequencies) can actually penetrate the sea floor (like a couple of feet deep) to scan for fish. Interestingly too, they can apparetnly see in X-ray fasion because of their sonar.

http://www.treasur.com/dolphins2.htm

http://www.dolphinencounters.com/sounds.htm

I don't hold fast to the notion that Matt has to be able to see though walls. But, I don't think, if he has sonar like abilities that it's out of the question. As for examples of Matt "seeing" though walls. Look, in the Eletkra Saga, when Elektra and her dad are held hostage, the artist depicts (and other artists have done similar) Matt "seeing" what is going on in the room. Now, sure, this could be just an "artist" depiction. Like, it's just an "idea" of what Matt "perceives." But, watch that sequence, as Matt enters the room he INSTANTANEOUSLY knows where to attack and he knows Elektra is on a chair.

As for Foggy's castket. Even if Matt's radar wouldn't work here (and who's to say it couldn't) I still think it was suspect that no one was allowed to see the body. C'mon, it wasn't like he was disfigured or anything. I think Bru just had to write that illogical part (as I mentioned back when it happened, and he tried to justify it, try as he might) to make his story work.

At the end of the day, I think it's cooler if Matt can see though walls.

By the way, the entry of DD in the omnibus also says that by simply turning his head slightly, Matt can help focus on an object. So, there, just a little more info.


Seriously, it would be cool if Bru read up on radar and sonar and expaned on the radar (as long as he sticks to the traditional emitted waves). Or just research all senses. Heck, it would be cool if Matt was shown to smell skin cancer on someone. Dogs can actaully do this. Seriously, the realm of the senses and radar could be so much fun with little research.

rgj
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm going to be brief here (should be getting to bed), but I'll just quickly comment.

rgj wrote:
Just a reminder, Matt's "radar" is also "sonar" like.

Matt can "see" underwater. This was first stated in Lee's initial run.

Interestingly too, they can apparetnly see in X-ray fasion because of their sonar.

Yes, you're absolutely right in how various sources describe it, which unfortunately doesn't mean that it makes much sense at all. Dolphins use sound waves with a completely different form of propagation than electromagnetic waves (like radar). Whatever DD is using must be either sound waves or electromagnetic waves, but they are completely different entities that behave in very different ways. The most likely explanation is that the writers have been making this stuff up as they go along. Wink


rgj wrote:
I don't hold fast to the notion that Matt has to be able to see though walls. But, I don't think, if he has sonar like abilities that it's out of the question. As for examples of Matt "seeing" though walls. Look, in the Eletkra Saga, when Elektra and her dad are held hostage, the artist depicts (and other artists have done similar) Matt "seeing" what is going on in the room. Now, sure, this could be just an "artist" depiction. Like, it's just an "idea" of what Matt "perceives." But, watch that sequence, as Matt enters the room he INSTANTANEOUSLY knows where to attack and he knows Elektra is on a chair.

Yes, Matt has often been depicted "seeing" through walls (still is actually), and that has become something that writers consider him capable of, but the concept is actually very iffy and scientifically unsound. I can live with it, because few things in comic books make much sense, but it really is kind of weird.

rgj wrote:
As for Foggy's castket. Even if Matt's radar wouldn't work here (and who's to say it couldn't) I still think it was suspect that no one was allowed to see the body. C'mon, it wasn't like he was disfigured or anything. I think Bru just had to write that illogical part (as I mentioned back when it happened, and he tried to justify it, try as he might) to make his story work.

As for no one being allowed to see the body, I guess that's just one of those things that you have to ignore to make a story work. As for not recognizing the body, I think it's generally safe to say that it's easier to prove something than disprove it. What I mean is that if it had been Foggy in the casket, there might have been signals that Matt would have picked up on (and here I'm going with smell exclusively for reasons stated above). But in order to disprove something like that you'd need something more conclusive. I also think that Matt went into the situation convinced of Foggy's death and wasn't specifically looking for any clues that might have led him to believe otherwise.

rgj wrote:
By the way, the entry of DD in the omnibus also says that by simply turning his head slightly, Matt can help focus on an object. So, there, just a little more info.

Yeah, I think the MUH says that too, and this makes sense to me. Not that he would be able to focus on it more, but that he would be able to get a few different "shots" that he could piece together in his head.

At the end of the day, I think we have to realize that most people at Marvel aren't very good at any of this stuff (which might even be a good thing in the end...). I would have loved to see more consistency in the book, but most of the stuff holds together very well. Sort of. If you want to look at stuff in the MUH that proves that the writers (of that book at least) don't know what they're talking about, check out how they describe his sense of hearing (which, oddly enough, is the same in the 2004 edition as it was in the 80's edition) that states that he can hear down to 7 dB. Considering that the normal hearing threshold is 0 dB (though they claim it's 20 dB), that's not very impressive. So evidently, the poor guy isn't only blind, he's got a slight hearing impairment as well... Wink
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1) Is the radar sense always active?

Sometimes. I think that during daylight hours his radar is always on. Given that it's based on waves it makes sense that light, which is sometimes a wave, would activate the radar. At night, I think the radar is only active when injustice is happening or when Matt thinks about injustice.

2) Does using it require active concentration/attention?

See above.

3) Is the radar sense better at picking out dense objects (like metals versus people)?

I doubt it's that black and white. I think that it probably picks up metal and stones very well. Then it sort of drops off in accuracy around the people/squishy sort of things. But then it's really good again for jello type substances.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Blind Alley
Tree of Knowledge


Joined: 06 Nov 2004
Posts: 292
Location: Lyon, France

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Radar questions – what do you think? Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:
Is the radar sense better at picking out dense objects?


Yeah. And dense people, too.
That's why DD can track Turk and Groto so easily.
_________________
Visit the Red Shaker
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group