Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


Should Frank Miller ever write Daredevil again?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bullseye11
Flying Blind


Joined: 05 Oct 2013
Posts: 67
Location: PA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Absolutley not. Has anyone read frank Millers blog? Around 911 he went absolutely nuts and all his work is crap. He would only tarnish the daredevil name.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Acerbus
Flying Blind


Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 96
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 6:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bullseye11 wrote:
Absolutley not. Has anyone read frank Millers blog? Around 911 he went absolutely nuts and all his work is crap. He would only tarnish the daredevil name.


Yeah, and Mark Waid's shoehorning his liberal agenda into a superhero comic with the subtlety of an H-bomb. Both approaches are propaganda. But at least Frank Miller owns up to it, and admits that Holy Terror was an outright experiment in propaganda.

'40s Batman, Superman and Captain America were all propaganda. It's part of the roots of comic books. Why in the lowest chambers of hades would a guy like Frank Miller - whose longest abiding inspirations (film noir, pulp novels and comics) all have their roots in the '30s/'40s - not be inspired by the most popular comic movement of that period?!

Sorry for performing thread necromancy, but I was just considering this question. And yes. Assuming Frank's health issues are well behind him, I would personally love to see another Miller-penned Daredevil. It's been over 20 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Overlord
Paradiso


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 1095

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acerbus wrote:
Bullseye11 wrote:
Absolutley not. Has anyone read frank Millers blog? Around 911 he went absolutely nuts and all his work is crap. He would only tarnish the daredevil name.


Yeah, and Mark Waid's shoehorning his liberal agenda into a superhero comic with the subtlety of an H-bomb. Both approaches are propaganda. But at least Frank Miller owns up to it, and admits that Holy Terror was an outright experiment in propaganda.

'40s Batman, Superman and Captain America were all propaganda. It's part of the roots of comic books. Why in the lowest chambers of hades would a guy like Frank Miller - whose longest abiding inspirations (film noir, pulp novels and comics) all have their roots in the '30s/'40s - not be inspired by the most popular comic movement of that period?!

Sorry for performing thread necromancy, but I was just considering this question. And yes. Assuming Frank's health issues are well behind him, I would personally love to see another Miller-penned Daredevil. It's been over 20 years.


I think the over the top propaganda of 1940s was a thing of its time. It would be a hard sell to audiences today, a lot of elements of pop culture from the 1940s would not be suitable today.

Also All Star Batman and Robin wasn't political propaganda, it was just a bad story, I don't think he has written anything good since the 90s. He's like Stan Lee, a good writer of his time, but take him out of that time and his work is not as good.


Last edited by The Overlord on Thu Apr 23, 2015 2:34 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kentuckydevil
Flying Blind


Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 79

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

would love to see rucka and lark try again...but it ain't happening..

as mentioned..jeff lemier(sp)..and A Sorrentino.would be great..

perhaps its time for dennis hopeless to get a shot.. I remember reading his name was out there as a possible a yr or so ago..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dayle88
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 25 Mar 2015
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess it depends on whether or not he is consciously writing things the way he is or has profoundly changed so much that that is all he can do now.

Either way, a mini series is more Daredevil so I'd be on board for that. If he did the main series and it was terrible he'd be kicked off pretty quick and I'm bored of Waid now so it wouldn't be a big deal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thomam
Flying Blind


Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 48
Location: Louisville, Ky

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:30 pm    Post subject: Christos Gage? Reply with quote

Absolution by Christos Gage was great! Gage also wrote some of the netflix episodes.

Gage?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Overlord wrote:

Also All Star Batman and Robin wasn't political propaganda, it was just a bad story, I don't think he has written anything good since the 90s. He's like Stan Lee, a good writer of his time, but take him out of that time and his work is not as good.


I like All Star Batman and Robin. It's over the top and crazy but also sort of touching (if you stick with it). Has some of Miller's best lines/scenes of all time in it. For that matter I like Dark Knight Strikes Again. That one's a bit harder to defend but it was worth it for Carrie as Catwoman and the wicked Atom scene.

Was Stan Lee ever a good writer?
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dimetre
Underboss


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1366
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
I like All Star Batman and Robin. It's over the top and crazy but also sort of touching (if you stick with it). Has some of Miller's best lines/scenes of all time in it.

I own, sadly, every issue of ASBAR, and I can't see how it's good at all, strong as Jim Lee's art is. Maybe it's because Miller's Batman has never been my Batman. I think I'm more into the Animated Series Batman, which owes more, in my opinion, to Denny O'Neil and Neil Adams than Miller. But ASBAR is mostly nonsense, with no depth.
james castle wrote:
Was Stan Lee ever a good writer?

Of course he was! I know people doubt the level of his contribution due to the Marvel Method. And I know that this is a Daredevil site, and most of his Daredevil work has not stood the test of time. But I'm still astounded by most of his Silver Surfer series he did with John Buscema, which I think is one of the greatest books Marvel ever put out. In fact, look at any of his Silver Surfer work, even the series he did with Moebius in the 80s.

Just like Daredevil has historically brought out the best in Miller, the Surfer brought out the best in Lee.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
The Overlord
Paradiso


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 1095

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
The Overlord wrote:

Also All Star Batman and Robin wasn't political propaganda, it was just a bad story, I don't think he has written anything good since the 90s. He's like Stan Lee, a good writer of his time, but take him out of that time and his work is not as good.


I like All Star Batman and Robin. It's over the top and crazy but also sort of touching (if you stick with it). Has some of Miller's best lines/scenes of all time in it. For that matter I like Dark Knight Strikes Again. That one's a bit harder to defend but it was worth it for Carrie as Catwoman and the wicked Atom scene.


I find Batman totally unsympathetic in All Star Batman and Robin, he kidnaps a child who's parents have been murdered and puts in a cave and makes him eat rats. Not a very good hero and I thought the dialogue was really bad, the "God damn Batman" line is only good for promoting snarky memes. Its a pretty bad story IMO, its only entertaining in a "So Bad its Good" way, but Miller used to be an actual good writer, not the comic book version of a Troma Film.

Also the less said about Holy Terror, the better.

james castle wrote:

Was Stan Lee ever a good writer?


I think Stan Lee was an important writer back in the Silver Age, he helped created a lot of important characters back then, along with Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko of course.

Sure some characters like Daredevil, X-Men and Iron Man were better when revamped by future writers, but Spider-Man and the Fantastic Four did not need a revamp, they were great from get the go. I think the really great Spidey and FF stories from Silver Age still hold up as great stories. Even with DD, Iron Man and the X-Men, Stan Lee and the other artists/writers at Marvel in the 60s created the characters that were revamped later.

So while Stan Lee was not DD's greatest writer, but he did create the concept of a blind lawyer super hero, created two of the most important supporting cast members and created his origin, those things were solid, really its DD's Silver Age rogues gallery is the weakest part of the book back then. But in a way, Stan Lee did create a foundation that Miller could build and improve upon, that is one thing that was great things about Marvel in the 70s and 80s, seeing other writers build upon many of the characters created in the Silver Age.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You both make the same points and I'm not completely unsympathetic. Still:

Miller: You didn't get a little choked up when Batman brings Dick to the graveyard? I thought that was a solid pay off for the entire series. It really should have just ended there. It was a really good and sad point well made. For me it redeemed the whole series. That said, I also like the rest of it. I get how "The God Damned Batman" may not be your cup of tea but for me it was pretty amazing.

Lee: I admit that I probably just haven't read enough stuff. Never read Silver Age Fantasic Four or Spider-Man or Silver Surfer. The only Marvel comics I've ever really cared about at all are Daredevil and the X-Men and, in my view, Stan Lee contributed very little to either of them. I've said this before but I don't even think Lee understands Daredevil now. Any time anyone asks him about Daredevil Lee goes on about how he's a blind hero, a handicapped hero - isn't that neat! But he isn't. Matt can "see" and hear and radar, etc. much, much better than anyone else. He's the furtherest thing from disabled - he's super abled! And even though I love them now I don't think Foggy and Karen are particularly original. Chubby Funny Sidekick and Blonde Love Interest? Pretty hard to come up with something more generic.

I also get annoyed when Lee takes credit when it's clearly not due. Just yesterday there was an interview with Bryan Singer who said that he asked Lee if he ever saw the X-Men as a stand in for LBGQ issues and Lee said "absolutely!". Which is completely ridiculous. Elsewhere Lee has admitted that he just got bored of writing origins. The whole X-Men as civil rights metaphor has nothing to do with Lee.

But I accept his Silver Surfer is good.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:

Any time anyone asks him about Daredevil Lee goes on about how he's a blind hero, a handicapped hero - isn't that neat! But he isn't. Matt can "see" and hear and radar, etc. much, much better than anyone else. He's the furtherest thing from disabled - he's super abled!


I'm not sure I agree with this on both sides of the equation. For starters, if you read Silver Age Daredevil, Stan Lee writes in almost every issue "they'd be even more shocked if they found out I was blind Matt Murdock, but with my super senses I can do (insert X) even better than a sighted person!" There seemed to be a compulsive need to show that Daredevil wasn't really disabled. On the other hand, you ask Frank Miller what appeals to him about Daredevil, his response is that Daredevil is a character defined by his limitations as much as his abilities. He's a superhero who can't see, but still goes out to fight unknown dangers.

I thought this post from The Other Murdock Papers did a good job explaining it (I particularly like the quote from #191:

Quote:
And, in Roulette (#191), by Frank Miller, Daredevil tells Bullseye “I was in my secret identity — as Matt Murdock, first class attorney — when I met Chuckie. The secret identity can be a relief, Bullseye. When I’m Murdock, I don’t have to use my amplified senses to pretend I’m not blind.” This, for me, is a much more mature handling of this aspect of the character than Stan Lee’s Matt, who would drop such lines as “I can color-coordinate my wardrobe better than any sighted man!” on every page. Okay, I made that last one up, but there was a definite pattern going on. My question for Stan would be: if the hero’s blindness must be rendered completely irrelevant at all cost, what was the point of making him blind in the first place?


Here is another good posting addressing the idea that his other senses more than make up for sight. Frankly, Daredevil is a hero who could face a villain who literally wears a sign saying his master plan and Daredevil would never know. As terrible as the Masked Matador is, I liked the way Stan Lee invented him: He's a villain who gives Daredevil way more trouble than a sighted hero. Daredevil listens for things like the rustling of a cape to figure out where his enemy is (granted, it's a trick he should maybe fall for once, not about twenty times).
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At the risk of pissing off Christine, I have to disagree. Sure you can drag out examples of 2D things that Matt misses and you can say that he only "sees" shapes but I'm not convinced.

We use our senses to get an accurate understanding of our environment. I don't think you can just say "sure, he can 'see' in 360 degrees". You have to say "He can 'see' in 360 degrees! That's astonishing! And he can do that all the time!" That gives him way more information about what's going on around him than sight ever could. Plus, the radar plus the senses give him the ability to senses things at a distance (I'm not going to speculate on how much of a distance (again so as not to anger Christine)) and to sense small things in a way no sighted person can. It's well established that he can "see" the trajectory of a bullet. Not being able to get 2D information is bad, for sure, but it's more than made up by being able to "see" a bullet as it flies and the like.

In the end it's a judgment call obviously but I don't think you can discount the radar as just seeing shapes in 360.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
admiralpetty
Flying Blind


Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 48
Location: Kalispell, MT

PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 12:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My reply is simply meant for the title of the thread.

NO, MILLER SHOULD NEVER WRITE DAREDEVIL AGAIN!!!

As far as DD stories go, Miller is most definitely the best writer to ever work on Daredevil, as well as the writer who truly brought DD to greatness. I cannot overstate how much I adore Miller's DD work, as well as his work at DC during that era. His work on Daredevil and Batman changed comics going forward and the man is rightfully a comic book legend.

All of that being said, I tend to look at Miller as the George Lucas of comic books. He helped change the industry, and his early work is a treasure trove, but the man has lost his touch. All Star Batman and Robin(just one example of his terrible later work) was terrible, there are far to many bad things in that story to excuse any of the so-called good parts. At this stage in his career, Miller is a legend who doesn't have to listen to editors(who are probably to busy worshiping him anyway) or other sane people in the bullpen.

Lets look at Man Without Fear, Miller's last DD story, also a classic within DD's history. That story was excellent, but it had hints of some of Miller's worse writing traits that had yet to fully manifest themselves. Elektra was boiled down to a simple crazy hot chick with ninja skills, much less interesting than his earlier work on the character, who he created by the way. Also consider the Kingpin's involvement in child pornography and child sex trafficking in the story. Also see the fact that DD either kills or is responsible for the death of several thugs in the story as well. Now most of these elements fit the story quite well and can be reasonably explained as to their inclusion in the story.

Frankly within the context of the story I'm not overly bothered by any of these elements, but they all point to tendencies in Miller's writing which only got worse as the years went on. Things eventually devolved to the point where we are treated to a scene of Batman having sex with Black Canary in the rain while a group of thugs lie burning nearby in the pages of All Star Batman and Robin. Now just imagine how out of character and terrible a new DD story by Miller would be given the escalation of his writing. Granted, it would still be better than Daredevil Father Wink

For all our sakes, lets just remember the good Miller has done for DD, and hope he never ventures into Hell's Kitchen again.

...

Then again, it would be fascinating to see just how terrible it is, it may even top the so bad its good(or at least entertaining) territory of All Star Batman and Robin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I wanted anything from Miller, I wouldn't mind a short issue stuck in an anniversary. Ann Noccenti wrote a little story for Issue 500 that followed Brubaker's final issue. Something like that might not be a bad idea. If it sucks, it sucks. But, for something small for a big moment, he might put extra work into making it good.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nightwing2001
Flying Blind


Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 94
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If anyone has seen recent pictures of Frank with the cancer he is obviously fighting with you'd probably agree that it's going to be a big miracle if he is actually going to survive much longer. I really hope he can pull through, but from his looks these days I can't see it happening.

If he does though (and I hope for it) I would hope he stays away from doing any more work on the character. I think a lot of writers in comics seem to have their hayday of writing and then eventually the quality of their work goes downhill. Frank definitely fits in with this. Denny O Neil and Ann Nocenti are other former DD writers who at one time wrote some great stuff on the title (and other characters) but who now seem to write pretty sub par as well.

As for All Star Batman and Robin, personally I could never get through it. I tried a couple of times but it was just too awful for me. If he was purposely trying to make it that way or he really thought he was doing a serious story of quality I don't know. If he was really just doing it purposely bad I could respect it for that I guess, but I have a feeling he really thought he was doing great work with it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group