Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


DD Book Club: Guardian Devil
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dimetre
Underboss


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1366
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I'm looking forward to james castle's further critiques!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Foggy's Pal
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 106
Location: BEHIND MY DESK

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dimetre wrote:
Well, I'm looking forward to james castle's further critiques!


Yeah, I think we are all going to have to try a little harder Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Foggy's Pal wrote:
Dimetre wrote:
Well, I'm looking forward to james castle's further critiques!


Yeah, I think we are all going to have to try a little harder Embarassed


To be honest, so am I. I remember the broad strokes of the plot and where we start and where we end but I genuinely don't know what a careful tracking of the plot will look like. Maybe I'll reveal Smith as a genius. Maybe it'll get super wacky. Who can say?

In any event, I'm equally interested in what people who are reading it for the first time/for the first time in a long time go through as we move forward so I think this is going to be great.

Are we all reading #2 now?
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great post, JC, in under the wire. Shocked

Next up, Guardian Devil pt. 2: The Unexamined Life



Same as before. Review due by Sunday, 10/12, but try to get it in early so we have time to discuss it. I'll try and have mine up sooner rather than later, but we'll see.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, issue two. We were asking who hasn't read it before. I didn't read it before, but I'm sure I've heard parts of it. Just where those parts fit in and how I'll feel about them, we'll have to see. I also read this issue last week before reading any comments and then went back after the comments to see if a re-read affects my reaction. That way I can try and get a sense of both a "pure" read and a more controlled read.

Starting off, I'm not at all convinced Kevin Smith knows how to write for Matt Murdock. And when something seems out of character for him, anyone else who accepts it as normal seems out of character as well (Foggy, Karen, and Natasha). I think he plays up Matt's faith too much. I just don't see him as a regular attender of Sunday Mass. The closest we got previously to anything like this was Typhoid Mary calling him a Merry Christian, but she was weird so I didn't put much weight in it. And the thing is, it isn't necessary. The story is about a crisis of faith for him. It would work just as well with awakening something that was more part of his childhood instead. To me, Matt is someone who considers himself a believer but doesn't actually practice. And that doesn't seem like it would change the story much to do.

The plot itself is in for a penny in for a pound when it comes to the biblical theme so far. Still, it's a nice grave choice they've given him that's worth the internal struggle that Daredevil would have to go through. I'm just not sure they pushed Daredevil to the point where he'd willingly hurl a baby off the side of a building just yet. I mean, they gave him 48 hours. I just don't think he'd make that decision in two. At least not without trying to get more information. My suspicions last week were that the Kingpin was involved somehow. That appears to not be the case and I'm relieved about that. Everything overall just seems a bit too weird, but I'll agree that's also part of the charm. Then there's the twist at the end (full disclosure, I've heard something about it before, but I'll withhold comment and speculation for now). It at least ups the stakes.

The art is beautifully drawn this issue, even better than the first. Full of vibrant colors and attention to detail. I still don't like how Matt is drawn, but I also don't like how he's portrayed so maybe that makes sense. That being said, I do want to talk about dialog and framing. A lot of people are complaining about how verbose Smith is. I just finished reading D.G. Chichester's Fall from Grace and read a wonderful interview with Chichester and artist Scott McDaniel. Chichester was very critical of how verbose he was (and for good reason). But, going from old comics to new (where I'm used to Ann Nocenti and Chichester), Smith doesn't seem all that out of place. On the other hand, McDaniel was critical of how he had a confusing layout in the issues, particularly stacking panels on the left side. I noticed that here too. Panels that are hard to follow from one to the next, dialog that nearly covers the scene, etc. Certainly, Smith is a writer who likes to write, which isn't what comics always need. I've had a couple times I had to re-read a page just to know which order to read things in.

Since I may not get many moments to comment on the law, I'll take advantage of it when I can and Foggy did something worthy of comment (legal disclaimer: although I'm a lawyer, nothing I say is intended as legal advice): Do not, under any circumstances, sleep with a client (Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8j). I know of an attorney who got disbarred who had clients and then passed them off to another attorney so he could evade the rule and have sex with them. It obviously didn't work. Then, of course, is the divorce attorney who had sex with his client and then billed for his time. It makes a good lawyer joke, but, yeah, he's been suspended indefinitely. I guess we'll see how it goes (given the shadowy guy in the background), but I'll just say tread carefully, Franklin Nelson, tread carefully...
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Foggy's Pal
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 106
Location: BEHIND MY DESK

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First, nothing to do with current issue, but I want us to read Fall from Grace- I just get lost.
Anyway, without digging in too much, two things really jumped out at me.
1. I think we have agreed that Matt is a man of Faith, or at least belief, but most likely not a weekly practitioner. The fact that he would willingly throw a baby off of a building is ridiculous. He is far too practical for this. That kind of action is for fanatics who have gone off the deep end. Really out of character. I hate that Matt does this.
2. "When it rains it pours"- Smith uses this line a few times. It seems Smith wants to really put Matt to the test. The line screams, "look how I'm challenging Matt!" Previous storylines, those by Miller especially, don't need to tell you Matt is being put through the ringer. The stories make sense and speak for themselves. You feel for Matt. Smith's story, at times, seems contrived to be tough on Matt- especially the last page reveal with Karen. Poor storytelling imo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Foggy's Pal wrote:

1. I think we have agreed that Matt is a man of Faith, or at least belief, but most likely not a weekly practitioner.


I don't agree. There's very little evidence outside of Smith's run that Matt is an active believer. Taken as a whole it's ambiguous at best. Smith's over reliance on it is just another example of his unfamiliarity with the character.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Foggy's Pal
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 106
Location: BEHIND MY DESK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
Foggy's Pal wrote:

1. I think we have agreed that Matt is a man of Faith, or at least belief, but most likely not a weekly practitioner.


I don't agree. There's very little evidence outside of Smith's run that Matt is an active believer. Taken as a whole it's ambiguous at best. Smith's over reliance on it is just another example of his unfamiliarity with the character.


I would think there is a religious foundation/background there, something he struggles with. Maybe "active" was the wrong choice of words. My point though, was that throwing a baby off a building was ridiculous, and only a religious zealot would do such a thing, which Matt is not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Foggy's Pal wrote:
First, nothing to do with current issue, but I want us to read Fall from Grace- I just get lost.


Please don't. I feel like I have to point on the doll where Fall from Grace touched me. The thread I started called "Where do I go from here" has a sort of stream of consciousness review of that story. It gets about halfway through before I give up reviewing.

Quote:
Anyway, without digging in too much, two things really jumped out at me.
1. I think we have agreed that Matt is a man of Faith, or at least belief, but most likely not a weekly practitioner. The fact that he would willingly throw a baby off of a building is ridiculous. He is far too practical for this. That kind of action is for fanatics who have gone off the deep end. Really out of character. I hate that Matt does this.
2. "When it rains it pours"- Smith uses this line a few times. It seems Smith wants to really put Matt to the test. The line screams, "look how I'm challenging Matt!" Previous storylines, those by Miller especially, don't need to tell you Matt is being put through the ringer. The stories make sense and speak for themselves. You feel for Matt. Smith's story, at times, seems contrived to be tough on Matt- especially the last page reveal with Karen. Poor storytelling imo.


Yeah, the setup hasn't created the payoff he's hoping for. Certainly not at this point. While I don't think the Kingpin is involved, Romanoff easily pointed out that knowing his secret identity is meaningless as a method of determining whether or not a character has supernatural knowledge.

As for Matt being a man of faith, I agree with others that there's nothing else that really shows it. That being said, I tend to go with "culturally Catholic" so I'm willing to assign some of the same working class Catholic upbringings that Smith gave him, just nowhere near to the same degree. I have no problem with him going to CCD as a kid, for example, which means he's generally accepting of the tenants of Catholicism. Where I reject them is the idea that he lets any of them impact his life. I certainly doubt he'd have gone to mass since he started college (or probably high school or probably even earlier than that). Could Karen leaving cause him to try and reach out to his faith? Possibly. I just don't think Smith has effectively presented this. Too much of the dialog centers around the idea that he'd do something like this anyway. Whether or not he was serious when he told Karen she was going to hell, the letter still suggested he went every week. Romanoff seemed to agree that church was a regular event for Matt. Finally, the line at the end of the issue (the one that was the most contrived) where Karen took Matt's "good God" literally as a jumping off point to blame God reinforces the whole thing. I'd never imagine Matt casually talking out loud about God.

And this is coming from someone who literally fought the Devil while in Hell. If you believe in the Devil, it's easier to believe in God. Of course, it really cuts the other way. After fighting Mephisto, his mind snapped. His belief as an adult was that Hell isn't real. Now maybe those events changed things, but I'm skeptical.

That being said, I agree that Karen wouldn't be a religious person, and a cultural clash between the two of them would have been something interesting to explore if it didn't seem out of character to explore it (and, more importantly, it's the kind of story that would work best if the two were together but, until now, Karen's been gone. It's only explored through offhand comments that don't really work).
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the depth of Matt's religious belief or non-belief is ambiguous at best and is best kept ambiguous. I think it's great that people of faith can identify with Matt and that people of unfaith can do the same. Efforts to make him very religious (Smith and also Lee Weeks come to mind) therefore usually feel a bit off.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope this isn't too spammy since I just posted my last one but I finished this quickly so here it is:

WHAT IS THE BAD GUY DOING AND WHAT DOES HE WANT? ISSUE 2.

At this stage we’re not sure who the bad guy is or how many bad guys there are. Remember, we’re looking for the big bad so henchmen don’t really count. Therefore, although Mister Gabriel is a bad guy he’s not listed because he’s just a henchman. So far the list of suspects contains:

    The Putter who is definitely a bad guy but whose true identity is cloaked in mystery (and well placed comic shadows).

    Mr. Macabes otherwise known by me as Tiny Colonel Sanders. We’re not sure what he’s up to or if he’s even a bad guy but he wants to murder a baby so we’re generally suspicious of him. In any event, now that we have multiple baddies and potential baddies I’ll have to be more specific about who did what and why.


1. Presumable a bad guy blew up a maternity ward. We now know that other babies were killed in hospitals all across the city. Still, we’re not sure who did this. Maybe The Putter? But why? Maybe Tiny Colonel Sanders did it. He wants to kill one baby. Maybe he already killed a bunch of babies? I’m sure we’ll get an explanation later. Why did someone do this? Unknown.

2. FACT: The Putter hired two rude dudes to kill Gwen's parents. This is basically a fact now but we still don’t know why he did it.

3. The Putter hired the two rude dudes to "eliminate" "the quarry". It’s still unclear which “quarry” is meant to be “eliminated”. BUT, Tiny Colonel Sanders tells Matt the baby must be killed. So maybe he’s working for The Putter to kill the baby? Also, Mister Gabriel catches Gwen and loads her into a limo where The unseen Putter notes that “The chase is ended”. So if The Putter wants to “eliminate” Gwen we can expect that her elimination will come along shortly and we can close this mystery. Why “the quarry” has to be “eliminated?” Unknown.

4. The Putter did not have anything to do with the apparently miraculous birth. Maybe Tiny Colonel Sanders did (if he’s lying) but since he wants to kill the baby he probably didn’t.

5. The Putter plans to intercede in a more direct way. It’s still unclear what this means Have we already seen his intercession or is it still to come?. (FUN FACT: “intercession” is a noun that means an act of interceding. It’s also mean “to pray on another’s behalf”. I suspect this is Smith tossing in religiousy words to sound smart but maybe The Putter is going to pray on behalf of someone?). Why does he have to intercede? Unknown.

6. The Putter plans to appeal to Daredevil's humanity. It’s still unclear what this means. At this point two people have appealed to DD’s humanity: Gwen when she begs him to help the baby and tiny Colonel Sanders when he begs him to kill the baby. Is The Putter behind one or both of these? It’s possible that The Putter sent the Lord’s message to Gwen somehow and that was the intercession in 5 above. But, at this point - who knows? Why is he appealing to DD’s humanity? Unknown.

7. Tiny Colonel Sanders, a member of “Sheol” (a secret society that was responsible for the creation of Spider-Man, The Hulk and Daredevil) magically schedules an appointment in Matt’s daytimer and then tells Matt the baby is the anti-Christ and has to be killed. He gives Matt 48 hours to deliver the baby to them and warns that while he has the baby bad things will happen to him. Macabes leaves behind a cross thing in Matt’s hand.

8. Tiny Colonel Sanders wants to kill the baby because it’s the anti-Christ. This is according to him.

STRANGE DOINGS AND MYSTERIES SO FAR

The Lord appears before Gwen and tells her to seek out Matt Murdock/Daredevil. She tells him that the baby is the result of a virgin birth and that he has to protect it to save the world. Interestingly, Tiny Colonel Sanders knows this because he knows what Gwen told Matt in the office. How or why he knows this is unclear.

Foggy is weirdly in love with Lydia. UPDATE: Lydia invites Foggy into her apartment for some hanky panky while someone dressed in a Dick Tracy outfit lingers in the hall.

Matt uncharacteristically beats up a mugger in a particularly over the top way.

Matt tries to throw the baby off with the roof water.

Karen shows up with AIDS in what is certainly the worst scene in the history of Daredevil comics and potentially the worst scene of anything ever. (FUN FACT: it was here that a young, wide eyed (although undergrad) james castle first raised an eyebrow and suspected that we might be in for some chop).
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?


Last edited by james castle on Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW, I've taken it that the putter guy and Macabes are not on the same side, but it's far from clear. I might have to re-read the first issue to see if they both want to kill the baby or if one just wants to capture it.

Honestly, at this point, the baby tossing bothers me more than Karen having AIDS at this point. Karen has had a hell of a life. I've gotten the impression she's put it away for years now so that's a long time for undiagnosed HIV, but porn and intravenous drug use together makes you a high risk to be HIV Positive. Granted, it's extremely heavy and I didn't like the "Good God"/"Forget your God after what he's done to me" lines, but it's not completely absurd. Given the dialog so far, it's mostly par for the course.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Foggy's Pal
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 106
Location: BEHIND MY DESK

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike Murdock wrote:
BTW, I've taken it that the putter guy and Macabes are not on the same side, but it's far from clear. I might have to re-read the first issue to see if they both want to kill the baby or if one just wants to capture it.


I don't think they are working together, and my assumption is that they both want the baby killed, but the Putter uses the term "quarry" so it is unclear. Maybe there is more to the girl than we know. It seems Smith is throwing a lot at the wall in the first two issues so it wouldn't surprise me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dragonbat
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 15 Jan 2014
Posts: 144
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The art is really grating on me in this issue. The tension builds well, but at this point, I have to agree with Natasha about Matt being too gullible. (Yeah. I know that'll be addressed.)

Also, telling her to check the diaper? Um... shouldn't Matt KNOW if it needs changing? (And shouldn't she call him on it?)

Like the pacing, hate the art, vacillating on the writing. Some of the dialogue is wonderful. (I like the initial conversation between Matt and Natasha, until he hands her the baby). Some of Matt's internal monologue is great. And then... there are lines that take me totally out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's broad comedy. I'll admit I did chuckle, but it was probably the easiest joke to make in that situation. Either way, I wouldn't take it too seriously. I'm sure Matt knows one way or the other, even if he wouldn't admit it.

Just to give my rating. I didn't like this one as much as the first. The first was judged just on its set-up. I thought it delivered that just fine. The second one is where the story has to start to build, but it comes off as a bit too convoluted and not well-sold. While I'm sure half stars are fine, I'm sticking with whole stars for now. This one gets a three out of five.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 2 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group