Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


Daredevil's origins
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Gloria
Redemption


Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 711
Location: Suburbia around Barcelona

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:56 am    Post subject: Daredevil's origins Reply with quote

Within the last week, I've come across annoyed, or irate comments (one person actually stating to be "pissed off") about "Daredevil: Yellow". The reason: "It changes Daredevi's origins! It presents Matt as being in college when his father is murdered" and then comments about how they hate retcons or origins of characters being changed.

My jaw drops.

Because, wether you like or not "Daredevil: Yellow", you can't certainy accuse Jeph Loeb of changing DDs origins: Matt lost his father while at college. It was Frank Miller, in his miniseries "Man without Fear" that opted to change Matt's past (he had already introduced Stick and Elektra, but this didn't alter Matt's past too much, as it "filled blanks" in it, rather than altering what had already been written)

I'm not about criticising MWF, which I consider an excellent series, but the bad thing is that the DD film, and some DD writers, have chosen to follow that story to retell Dds origins, and present Matt as a child orphan, so for some people this is "the original origin", and these people gets angry when Matt's early days are presented as they have -actually-always been prior to Miller's retcon.

Examples: J.M. De Matteis, or Joe Kelly, included the "Matt vandalizes a brothel" MWF scene in their stories. When Milla is looking for Matt and has a long talk with Ben Urich, Alex Maalev draws a flashback scene where Matt doesn't look older than nine when he mourns his dad... But then other writers stick to the classic origins: i.e. Loeb in Yellow, Brubaker in the regular series (we see Matt reminiscing about his father's death: he's a grown young man and Foggy is at his side in the morgue), and, well... Frank Miller himself in his writing of the regular series, where he writes DD's youth without straying away from the classic origins.

So now it seems to be a creative choice: the writer is the one who decides to stick to one or other continuity. Should it be so?

Someone who, like me, prefered the classic -canon- origins, stated this reason (which are pretty coincident with mine):
One: that re-imagining Matt loosing his father at an earlier age (nearly a child) makes him repeat/copy the classic Batman genesis... But DD ain't Batman, and Bruce the orphan has a fortune, a butler, and a minder. What does have Matt to allow a blind orphaned child from Hell's Kitchen to reach college? a bit from extra cash that Jack got in his last combats?

To which I add the following:

Two: Having Jack rearing Matt until he gets to college tells us a lot of positive things about the man. He fights hard so his boy can be someone better than him. He fights hard so his blind son can have an education which will help him get a good job -and have a future- in spite of his handicap. The canon origins portray a greater bond between father and son.

Three: The MWF retcon presents Matt as someone bitterer and more of a loner, than he was originally. Point in case: the classic origins present Foggy as a brotherly figure, as someone who is there to support Matt when Jack dies, as someone who offers his blind, orphaned pal to become his partner in law. MWF, while retaining Foggy's figure as a friend, somewhat estranges his role as a surrogate brother.

Now, ladies and gentlemen, let me know your views: do you prefer the classic origin or the retconned one?
_________________
Gloria
Devuélveme el rosario de mi madre y quédate con todo lo demás

"Para la cuesta arriba quiero mi burro, que la cuesta abajo yo me la subo"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I personally prefer the retconned one, the one with Jack killed before Matt went to college. Of course, with Matt depicted as a youngster in his late teens (him being a kiddie in Milla's flashback is too inconsistent).

Also, I don't really see the risk of his origin repeating Batman's. Let's face it, the killing of a father is all they have in common. Batman's is quite corny, compared to DD's "Haw I'll take those pearls - bang bang - I become a master scientist and an athlete - I must strike terror in the cowards and supertitious - look a bat it's an omen"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:45 am    Post subject: Re: Daredevil's origins Reply with quote

First off, thanks Gloria for writing a long post so I don't have to feel bad when I write entire essays (it seems I can never have an opinion on anything, whether DD related or not that can be expressed in less than ten sentences). Laughing

Gloria wrote:
Within the last week, I've come across annoyed, or irate comments (one person actually stating to be "pissed off") about "Daredevil: Yellow". The reason: "It changes Daredevi's origins! It presents Matt as being in college when his father is murdered" and then comments about how they hate retcons or origins of characters being changed.

My jaw drops.

As it should. Regardless of which origin you prefer, people should at least know that there is a difference between the original and MWF.

Gloria wrote:
Someone who, like me, prefered the classic -canon- origins, stated this reason (which are pretty coincident with mine):
One: that re-imagining Matt loosing his father at an earlier age (nearly a child) makes him repeat/copy the classic Batman genesis... But DD ain't Batman, and Bruce the orphan has a fortune, a butler, and a minder. What does have Matt to allow a blind orphaned child from Hell's Kitchen to reach college? a bit from extra cash that Jack got in his last combats?

To which I add the following:

Two: Having Jack rearing Matt until he gets to college tells us a lot of positive things about the man. He fights hard so his boy can be someone better than him. He fights hard so his blind son can have an education which will help him get a good job -and have a future- in spite of his handicap. The canon origins portray a greater bond between father and son.

Three: The MWF retcon presents Matt as someone bitterer and more of a loner, than he was originally. Point in case: the classic origins present Foggy as a brotherly figure, as someone who is there to support Matt when Jack dies, as someone who offers his blind, orphaned pal to become his partner in law. MWF, while retaining Foggy's figure as a friend, somewhat estranges his role as a surrogate brother.

Now, ladies and gentlemen, let me know your views: do you prefer the classic origin or the retconned one?

I totally agree. I prefer the original origin as well. I like the idea that Matt knew his father as a grown man, and that his dad would have died knowing that Matt was doing okay, and had a good future ahead of him. The presence of Matt's dad in the background during his childhood and entire adolescence also makes Matt less depressing as a character (in a good way), and I can kind of imagine them looking out for each other. The whole "Matt the blind orphan in foster care (I presume...)" doesn't really work for me. I also like the idea that he had Foggy by his side when his dad died.

Another thing that is a little weird about the MWF retcon is his age when he avenges his fathers killers. It never states his age exactly but he looks like a little kid. I don't care what kind of fighter he is, he doesn't have superhuman strength in any way and I don't think a guy who's barely into his teens should be out fighting crime. The death of his father led to the creation of the superhero in him, but in my mind this happened when he was a grown man who had had lots of time to reach emotional maturity and to adjust to the blindness+heightened senses combo and could work it to its fullest capacity.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You forget to take into consideration Stick's training.
In this sense, Yellow is the weirdest of the two, with Matt becoming a fighter seemingly all of a sudden.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:
You forget to take into consideration Stick's training.
In this sense, Yellow is the weirdest of the two, with Matt becoming a fighter seemingly all of a sudden.

But that was introduced by Frank Miller and is not in the original origin story. But I agree with you that the 1964 origin is a little naive in this sense. In it Matt starts working out before the accident, and then magically realizes that he has suddenly become better at everything afterwards (including becoming a better student for some unexplicable reason...).

The later addition of Matt actually having to learn to make sense of things and practice to develop his senses is a little more realistic and in this sense I think that Stick is a logical addition. The original origin also doesn't portray the heightened senses as being painfully intense so that is a later addition as well. According to the original, the story seems to be: boy has encounter with toxic waste - goes blind - doesn't miss a beat and proably learns Braille in like an afternoon or something - gradually notices that his senses are heightened - magically becomes better at everything completely effortlessly. I mean, who needs rehab, right? Wink

So yeah, the addition of Stick makes more sense, I totally agree.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Gloria
Redemption


Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 711
Location: Suburbia around Barcelona

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:
Gloria wrote:
My jaw drops.

As it should. Regardless of which origin you prefer, people should at least know that there is a difference between the original and MWF.


Yes. While I understand that some people, for instance ,may start reading DD after seeing the film, have no idea of what has been going on previously in the comic, and then have a "WTF!" feeling when what they read doesn't coincide with their prior knowledge (whether it is the film or the MWF mini), they should make a bit of checking before start shouting out loud.

It is like, say, I read an ongoing comics series which I have never read before, and about which I have no prior background altogether, and I read something in it which seems to me a little weird. Rather than shouthing "WTF!" I check wikipedia entries, or webplaces related to that series' characters: there's usually an explanation given.

Francesco wrote:
You forget to take into consideration Stick's training.
In this sense, Yellow is the weirdest of the two, with Matt becoming a fighter seemingly all of a sudden.

While DD's original origins are too uber-condensated in regards to what we are used today (I mean, How many issues would require Bendis to tell the same story? probably six story arches. Just kidding), it is explained that he trains while papa isn't at home, and continues training after his accident. So he's done his workout.

Still, you and Christine are right in your apreciations that Matt's rehab after the accident, his transition from student to vigilante fighter, etc... goes a bit too quick. Indeed, Miller's insertion of Stick was clever.

Still, and considering ALL what happens in the first DD issue back in 1964, I marvel and awe, for in just one issue we have Matt's early childhood, his growing pains in Hell's Kitchen, the accident, Matt getting his enhanced senses and radar, Matt in College, the origins of the Nelson & Murdock partnership, Jack's parenthood, Jack's fate and Matt's revenge against his father's murderers... Whew! And this origin is still pretty solid and holds pretty well today.

...I mean, Joe Quesada needed SIX frigging issues to just say "the blind man that Matt saved was a jerk"
_________________
Gloria
Devuélveme el rosario de mi madre y quédate con todo lo demás

"Para la cuesta arriba quiero mi burro, que la cuesta abajo yo me la subo"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gloria
Redemption


Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 711
Location: Suburbia around Barcelona

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:
I personally prefer the retconned one, the one with Jack killed before Matt went to college. Of course, with Matt depicted as a youngster in his late teens

I can see why, because MWF is a very good story... and yet, there's that big, big unexplained blank where Matt shifts from angsty, orphaned young boy who's just been abandoned by his mentor Stick, to his days in College.

It's a gap too big for me... How does he manage to get there?
_________________
Gloria
Devuélveme el rosario de mi madre y quédate con todo lo demás

"Para la cuesta arriba quiero mi burro, que la cuesta abajo yo me la subo"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dimetre
Underboss


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1366
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:
Francesco wrote:
You forget to take into consideration Stick's training.
In this sense, Yellow is the weirdest of the two, with Matt becoming a fighter seemingly all of a sudden.

But that was introduced by Frank Miller and is not in the original origin story. But I agree with you that the 1964 origin is a little naive in this sense. In it Matt starts working out before the accident, and then magically realizes that he has suddenly become better at everything afterwards (including becoming a better student for some unexplicable reason...).

The later addition of Matt actually having to learn to make sense of things and practice to develop his senses is a little more realistic and in this sense I think that Stick is a logical addition. The original origin also doesn't portray the heightened senses as being painfully intense so that is a later addition as well. According to the original, the story seems to be: boy has encounter with toxic waste - goes blind - doesn't miss a beat and proably learns Braille in like an afternoon or something - gradually notices that his senses are heightened - magically becomes better at everything completely effortlessly. I mean, who needs rehab, right? Wink

So yeah, the addition of Stick makes more sense, I totally agree.

I think Miller's addition of not only Stick, but also the surrounding conflict between the Hand and the Chaste, causing Stick to seek out Matt and Elektra in the first place, added so much to the origin story. Also, it's a little bit of a stretch to think that an American as apple pie blind kid, even with super-senses, would learn all those fighting techniques and disciplines without any help. I also find it interesting that the reason Daredevil is fighting crime in Hell's Kitchen is because he actually was found out to be inadequate for the Chaste. Miller added so much, and I prefer his retcon to the original.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Solid Snake PAC
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 130
Location: Conroe, Tx

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd like to think that to an extent they are merged. MWF with gal out the window, fighting Kingpin's guys, etc. and Yellow with the late Teen MM in college with Dad still alive is a bit of a combination of sorts. I think MWF may try to skip out on the parts we already now of, or may not seem relevant to the core of that story. I dunno..in some scenes Matt seems to look older and in others seems to be older.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
blacktyphoid
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:26 am    Post subject: Re: Daredevil's origins Reply with quote

Gloria wrote:

I'm not about criticising MWF, which I consider an excellent series, but the bad thing is that the DD film, and some DD writers, have chosen to follow that story to retell Dds origins, and present Matt as a child orphan, so for some people this is "the original origin", and these people gets angry when Matt's early days are presented as they have -actually-always been prior to Miller's retcon.

Examples: J.M. De Matteis, or Joe Kelly, included the "Matt vandalizes a brothel" MWF scene in their stories.


Right! And in Joe Kelly's case, he ended up grafting Typhoid Mary's origin onto the Miller retcon (Typhoid being a prostitute in the brothel), making the Miller version of DD's origin fundamental to any discussion of Daredevil's sexually twisted history and relationship with her. Furthermore, by using the Miller retcon, Kelly ensured that DD and Typhoid Mary's origins were not only connected - but integral - to each other. Like the Elektra and Stick characters, the Typhoid Mary origin results in adding a new layer to Matt's pre-Daredevil life.

So, at least in Typhoid's case, the Miller retcon trumps the original origin.
____________________
blacktyphoid
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Acerbus
Flying Blind


Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 96
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Daredevil's origins Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:

I totally agree. I prefer the original origin as well. I like the idea that Matt knew his father as a grown man, and that his dad would have died knowing that Matt was doing okay, and had a good future ahead of him.


Have to disagree with you, there. While the original Stan Lee origin is absolutely fantastic, and for the time period, and considering the writer, very dark and ahead of its time... it just isn't terribly effective from the standpoint of drama to have his dad killed when he is a young adult. Him being killed while Matt is still just a child is obviously more effective psychologically, and presents far more dramatic possibilities.

Mind you, I don't think either origin makes or breaks the character - Daredevil is just that good - but I think Miller wisely saw that someone with a life full of experience leading up to his father's murder would be far less likely to dress up in tights to avenge him, than if he were severely traumatized at a young age by the event.

Quote:
The death of his father led to the creation of the superhero in him, but in my mind this happened when he was a grown man who had had lots of time to reach emotional maturity and to adjust to the blindness+heightened senses combo and could work it to its fullest capacity.


Fair enough, but in Miller's origin, there is present something that the Stan Lee origin unfortunately lacks... scenes in which he is still getting used to his 'powers' (which, I guess, aren't technically powers... if you've read Frank Miller's regular run). The Stan Lee origin gives all of that a pass, and he is instantly up and about and overhearing phone calls three blocks away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Daredevil's origins Reply with quote

Acerbus wrote:
jumonji wrote:

I totally agree. I prefer the original origin as well. I like the idea that Matt knew his father as a grown man, and that his dad would have died knowing that Matt was doing okay, and had a good future ahead of him.


Have to disagree with you, there. While the original Stan Lee origin is absolutely fantastic, and for the time period, and considering the writer, very dark and ahead of its time... it just isn't terribly effective from the standpoint of drama to have his dad killed when he is a young adult. Him being killed while Matt is still just a child is obviously more effective psychologically, and presents far more dramatic possibilities.

Mind you, I don't think either origin makes or breaks the character - Daredevil is just that good - but I think Miller wisely saw that someone with a life full of experience leading up to his father's murder would be far less likely to dress up in tights to avenge him, than if he were severely traumatized at a young age by the event.


I guess this is just a matter of taste, but his father dying when he was young leaves this big hole that no one has ever attempted to explain. What would have happened to him between the ages of twelve and eighteen? Orphanage, foster care? When it comes to the trauma, I think having a parent die as a young adult can be (almost) as traumatic. Well, minus the foster care. But that's just a difference of opinion I guess.

Quote:
Quote:
The death of his father led to the creation of the superhero in him, but in my mind this happened when he was a grown man who had had lots of time to reach emotional maturity and to adjust to the blindness+heightened senses combo and could work it to its fullest capacity.


Fair enough, but in Miller's origin, there is present something that the Stan Lee origin unfortunately lacks... scenes in which he is still getting used to his 'powers' (which, I guess, aren't technically powers... if you've read Frank Miller's regular run). The Stan Lee origin gives all of that a pass, and he is instantly up and about and overhearing phone calls three blocks away.

I totally agree with you, and I also mentioned (in this thread) that I think Miller's additions, from his initial run, were good ones since the original Stan Lee origin is a little too simplistic. Even if it were possible in real life, it's a bit of a stretch to think that someone could walk away from basically having one's physiology dramatically (and quite traumatically) altered without some form of guidance. Stick helping Matt master his senses was an excellent addition to the DD mythos. The original just has Matt walking away from the accident going "I'm just magically better at everything, lucky me!"

As for whether Matt's "powers" are actual powers, I would say that they are, even though Miller introduced the concept of this being some sort of natural consequence of the blindness and Stick's training. While I quite like Miller's take on the radar sense, his notion is based on the faulty premise that losing a sense somehow heightens your remaining senses. This is a very popular notion that only has the tiniest amount of truth to it. It is more a matter of becoming drastically better at using the remaining senses and the brain allocating more "space" to interpreting the information. One example from real life would be that blind people are better than sighted controls at determining the source of a sound. They don't actually hear better than anyone else, however. Another example of this would be how be how (signing) deaf people have slightly better peripheral vision. Their vision isn't technically better, but the brain becomes better at registering things happening at the edge of the visual field.

So, I would say that he probably needed to have all that radioactive stuff dumped on him for his senses to be heightened like that. But, then again, things work a little differently in the Marvel Universe so who knows? Wink On the other hand, I do like the idea that Matt uses a fairly large amount of skill to actually do what he does. Having your remaining senses dramatically heightened doesn't do you much good if you don't know what to do with the information.

To make a long story short, the addition of Stick makes total sense to me. As does the concept of the heightened senses being bewildering, painful and overwhelming at times. As far as I recall, that was introduced by Frank Miller as well. I like most of the early Miller retcons, but not all of the MWOF additions.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Blind Alley
Tree of Knowledge


Joined: 06 Nov 2004
Posts: 292
Location: Lyon, France

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Daredevil's origins Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:

I like most of the early Miller retcons, but not all of the MWOF additions.


So do I !
Thanks to Christine for expressing our mind, so we, lazy posters, only have to say "+1" or "I second that". Wink
_________________
Visit the Red Shaker
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Daredevil's origins Reply with quote

Blind Alley wrote:
jumonji wrote:

I like most of the early Miller retcons, but not all of the MWOF additions.


So do I !
Thanks to Christine for expressing our mind, so we, lazy posters, only have to say "+1" or "I second that". Wink

Well, thank you! Laughing And here I'm feeling bad about writing entire essays. I'm glad I could help out so you don't get carpal tunnel syndrome from typing too much. Wink
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
blacktyphoid
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For what it's worth, here's two interesting tidbits about DD's original origin:

DD was the very first silver age non-team Marvel superhero to premiere in his own book. (Spidey premiered in Amazing Fantasy; Thor premiered in Journey Into Mystery; Iron Man premiered in Tales to Astonish, and so forth...). In other words, DD didn't go through some sort of trial run as all the other burgeoning solo heroes in the Marvel line. That must have meant that Stan Lee right from the outset placed a lot of stock in ol' hornhead's ability to sell funny books.


Lee has often talked about the pride he felt in creating a superhero who was able to overcome a major disability (permanent blindness). Yet, DD's original artist, Bill Everett, reportedly had a daughter who was blind. Therefore, it's very possible that Everett may have had a more significant role in DD's creation than Lee provides. Could the foundation of DD's very being (ie. his blindness) come from Everett's personal and tragic experiences instead of Lee's imagination? If so, then despite the fact that Everett lasted only the one issue, his contribution to Daredevil's origins could be as huge as his role was in creating the Sub-Mariner.

______________________
blacktyphoid
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group