Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


The Fall of the Axe......
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
harryhausen
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 129
Location: U$A

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:24 pm    Post subject: The Fall of the Axe...... Reply with quote

Well, team, I know most of you will find this crazy, but I'm going to finish out this 'Lady Bullseye' arc and drop DD......

Shocking, huh?

I have hundreds and hundreds of issues and the last 114+ since the (wretched) K. Smith "re-invigoration," but I'm just not feeling it any more. I don't have the cash to drop on books that are just keeping the numbers sequential in my longbox, you know?

I recently re-read 'Born Again' and think I would rather just re-read classic DD periodically than buy the current run. I don't like the cinematic, "realistic" tone of the book. The art is not my cup of tea. Most importantly, though, I'm just so, so tired of this piling-ludicrous-woe-on-Matt trope. I almost hope someone kills him, just to end the cycle.

I'm not a fan of film (well, you know, Alphaville and whatnot) and don't own a TV. I am winning my personal war against the moving image. I don't like it when comics read like storyboards from mediocre TV shows. Come on - embrace the medium! I like the heady rush of a comic in all its ridiculous, garish madness.

Lastly, I have watched with dismay as I'm driven away from Marvel. Secret Invasion was very slight, at best. Brand New Day? No. The X-books are annoying (please give the flagship title to Mike Carey, you dolts! He's the only X-scribe who can write!). I was raised a Marvel Kid. Now I'm pulling 9 DC titles! What happened?

I think my distaste with Marvel in general has affected my tolerance for slogging along with this DD......

I know you can say that I'm denying the basic tenets of the character or the nature of comic characters, generally. Perhaps.

And so....I'll check in because I respect the opinions of all you fellow posters. I hope the worm turns soon and I can like it again, but for now, Make Mine uh, something else?

Oh, and I don't mean to presuppose that you folks should even care about my departure, I just thought some other readers may be feeling my frustration? Or at least understand my points. Or maybe someone wants to send me $3 a month to keep the numbers up for DD?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I for one am sorry to see you go. I think you've been great to chat with on these boards, and you seem like a great guy. So please, do check in with us from time to time, okay? Wink

I can sort of see where you're coming from. Daredevil has ceased to be a classic superhero book. I personally think it's better for it (in fact, I'm enjoying Brubaker more than I think I've enjoyed any other writer, while still respecting the "groundbreakingness" of the Miller run), but I understand that not everyone agrees.

What I do agree with you on is that Secret Invasion was utter garbage, and I'm not one to toss words like that around lightly. But I always felt like Daredevil was the exception to some of the more questionable directions Marvel editorial has chosen lately, and I still feel that way.

I do wish Bru would light up on the guy though. I've said before that I feel that Matt Murdock is like an actor who's been typecast into only playing one kind of role, when he's really much more versatile than that. He's got a sense of humor (much better than Spidey's if you ask me), and having him smile in two consecutive issues wouldn't ruin the character nor the tension of the story. But I've lived in Seattle for two years, so I guess I can learn to appreciate even months of rainy days when well executed. Wink

All the best to you in your future journeys into narrative fiction! Okay, so that sounded pretentious, but you know what I mean. I hope.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, sorry to see you go. I'm really not feeling DD right now either. Haven't been since volume 1 of the Devil Inside and Out. At the same time I've been collecting it for so long that I will literally keep buying it out of habit until I die. If I could live through the Kesel run, etc., I can live through this.

In unrelated news is Carey's X-Men that good? I'm tempted to pick up his run but have never gotten around to it.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kirika
Flying Blind


Joined: 05 Sep 2008
Posts: 57

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am always sad to see someone drop DD. Personally, Kevin Smith's run was where I started buying DD and Bru was the reason I got back into comics after a 2 year hiatus, so I can't say I feel the same way about the title that you do.

However, I agree that DC has been the better of the two lately. Every month it seems, I pick up another DC title and drop a Marvel.

Anyway, happy reading!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FatalRose
Flying Blind


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 41
Location: Alta Loma. CA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why does Marvel totally outsell DC? Right now I think I enjoy more DC books, but last I read Marvel was owning DC in sales.
_________________
http://www.1emulation.com/forums/index.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because Marvel puts sales first. They put potential sales ahead of quality over and over again. Hence, better comics from DC but more sales for Marvel.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Most importantly, though, I'm just so, so tired of this piling-ludicrous-woe-on-Matt trope. I almost hope someone kills him, just to end the cycle.


You're certainly not the only one. Do you find that this problem was there also before Brubaker became writer?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stanley
Tree of Knowledge


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 293
Location: Houston, TX.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am totally feeling this too.

I haven't bought a DD comic in...a year, maybe...?

I respect Brubaker, I think he does great work, and DD is always where my heart will reside.

But I think the idea that everything is a neatly constructed 6-issue arc just bugs me. I don't need a bunch of one-shots, but surely we can have something where his greater story is moving forward, but we're resolving something big enough in every issue...

I dunno. I think Bendis's lost year/Decalogue really took it out of me, so much so that when Brubaker simply came on and just piloted Bendis's run into his own, I was worn out.

I'm fighting the "wait 30 days for possibly marginal results" thing, I guess. I don't like thinking, "Oh, a six-issue arc about Taskmaster? Great. There's half a year of my life before I care again."

It's not an indictment of Brubaker, more the editorial decision-making.

Meanwhile, these characters aren't going to age, and the status quo really ISN'T going to change, so where's the incentive? The thought that you might actually die before your favorite character does kind of unnerves me. I want to know the end of the story, and all this 'act 2' stuff is wearing thin.

We've got more stories that just build on little bits of the past, making little revelations that add diminishing returns to the mythos. Honest question: do they even try to create new heroes anymore? I don't follow comics generally. Would anyone have the guts to retire the old guard and create the new?

This post is way more negative than my usual calling someone out. That's probably not a good thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, some people try to create new heroes. A few of those people (mainly Robert Kirkman) succeed. Invincible is an awesome comic, in no small part because Mark/Invincible actually grows up and ages in it. Runaways is also a good example of new heroes.

At the same time, you can make good stories with existing IPs. Joss' Astonishing X-Men was awesome and was able to say new things about Cyclops. New things about Cyclops! That's crazy.

For me, Bru's just not that great a writer. Everyone loves him because he's "noir". And that's great as long as you think "noir" means "slightly more talk than usual combined with 'mysterys'".

Like I said, I'll buy DD until I die but for now I'll be over in a corner enjoying Fables.[/url]
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
For me, Bru's just not that great a writer. Everyone loves him because he's "noir". And that's great as long as you think "noir" means "slightly more talk than usual combined with 'mysterys'".

Actually, that's not why I like him at all (nor have I heard anyone else mention this), but thanks for the psychoanalysis. Wink
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Acerbus
Flying Blind


Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 96
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
If I could live through the Kesel run, etc., I can live through this.


...but can you do it in less than twelve parsecs?

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

As for the OP, I'm sorry you feel that way. It sucks to see a good poster take off, but I couldn't disagree with your views on the book more. I am a little curious, though. I mean, tone-wise, Brubaker's Daredevil is basically the same as the last several runs, but with some much more diverse villains. I mean, in terms of approach, is Brubaker-Lark really that radical a departure from Bendis-Maleev? Or even Chichester-Weeks, or O'Neil-Mazzucchelli, for that matter? It just seems odd that you would choose now to drop a book that has been this dark, noir-tinged, and 'cinematic' for much longer than Brubaker has been making the scripts.

It's not like this is a sudden, unwelcome change in format, like when DC suddenly decided to change Detective Comics from a book comprised of great Dini one-shots into a book made virtually unreadable by Nguyen's bubbly, pastel-soaked art.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gloria
Redemption


Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 711
Location: Suburbia around Barcelona

PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
Well, some people try to create new heroes. (...) Invincible is an awesome comic

(...)for now I'll be over in a corner enjoying Fables.[/url]


Invincible is a fine example about authors creating news characters, as well as a whole new world around them: While I'm sentimental about the Classic Marvel and DC universes, I like a good, real Brand New superhero.

As per Fables, well, the characters aren't exactly new Wink but the twist on them is, and the Fableverse is ripe with possibilities: Willingham has enough stuff to write about it until the day he dies (i mean, look at what he's done and there is a lot of folklore left in the world to explore: I wonder what the African or Chinese Fablelore can deliver when he tackles them)
_________________
Gloria
Devuélveme el rosario de mi madre y quédate con todo lo demás

"Para la cuesta arriba quiero mi burro, que la cuesta abajo yo me la subo"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:
james castle wrote:
For me, Bru's just not that great a writer. Everyone loves him because he's "noir". And that's great as long as you think "noir" means "slightly more talk than usual combined with 'mysterys'".

Actually, that's not why I like him at all (nor have I heard anyone else mention this), but thanks for the psychoanalysis. Wink


The comment wasn't directed at you but thanks for replying anyways with a contentless post. Wink

As for people who have "mentioned" Bru's DD's as being noir, here's a link Bru' mentioning the noirity of his run:

https://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=8377
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gloria wrote:
james castle wrote:
Well, some people try to create new heroes. (...) Invincible is an awesome comic

(...)for now I'll be over in a corner enjoying Fables.[/url]


Invincible is a fine example about authors creating news characters, as well as a whole new world around them: While I'm sentimental about the Classic Marvel and DC universes, I like a good, real Brand New superhero.


You should really try out Runaways. It's the best of both worlds. All the kids are entirely "new" heroes. Plus, they operate out of LA (mostly) so they are out of the usual Marvel Universe spotlight. At the same time, though, every once and a while Spidey shows up and you remember you're in the Marvel U (the Punisher has a cameo in Joss Whedon's run that will blow your mind).
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stanley
Tree of Knowledge


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 293
Location: Houston, TX.

PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acerbus wrote:
james castle wrote:
If I could live through the Kesel run, etc., I can live through this.


...but can you do it in less than twelve parsecs?


Awesome. Srsly.


Acerbus wrote:

As for the OP, I'm sorry you feel that way. It sucks to see a good poster take off, but I couldn't disagree with your views on the book more. I am a little curious, though. I mean, tone-wise, Brubaker's Daredevil is basically the same as the last several runs, but with some much more diverse villains. I mean, in terms of approach, is Brubaker-Lark really that radical a departure from Bendis-Maleev? Or even Chichester-Weeks, or O'Neil-Mazzucchelli, for that matter? It just seems odd that you would choose now to drop a book that has been this dark, noir-tinged, and 'cinematic' for much longer than Brubaker has been making the scripts.

It's not like this is a sudden, unwelcome change in format, like when DC suddenly decided to change Detective Comics from a book comprised of great Dini one-shots into a book made virtually unreadable by Nguyen's bubbly, pastel-soaked art.


Actually, that's an extremely valid point. I certainly can't answer for the OP, but I know in my case that DD getting put through the ringer every issue is just wearing thin. It's not that it's a change in format, it's that there's ~no~ change.

Even when he does something that should make him happy (hooking up with Dakota), it doesn't. Not even in the short run. Not even a little bit. Beating villains only provides a slight relief, not any measure of closure.

I guess that's what I'm looking for--and I'm realizing I'm not going to find it.

"But Stanley", one might say, "it's supposed to be a monthly comic!" Look, I accept that he's eternally going to fight crime, but I just miss when he might stop a random robbery. Now it seems as though adventures are seeking him out, which was cute for the first four years--but now I want to see him take control.

...Not as 'The Kingpin', either. Just take control of his life.

I want him out of this phase, and instead solving mysteries that don't have direct consequences for him. Characters like Foggy mention that he's selfish and whiny, but that doesn't mean the writer should just be able to move on after he's acknowledged it. Shouldn't they get him out of the slump?

They never do that. I really wish they would.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group