| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| If Marvel makes a DD film, I'd like it to be a . . . |
| Sequel |
|
44% |
[ 4 ] |
| Remake |
|
55% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 9 |
|
| Author |
Message |
rgj
Hardcore
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:58 pm Post subject: Hulk 2 a "remake," not "sequel." DD opi |
 |
|
Seems like Avi Arad's vision of the next Hulk movie ("The Incredible Hulk) is a REMAKE and not a "sequel." Interesting.
http://www.moviehole.net/news/20060611_the_hunt_for_the_new_hulk.html
I wonder if he'd consider the same thing for DAREDEVIL if Marvel got the movie rights back. I can dream again!
rgj |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Forrest
Lowlife
Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IMHO, remake = complete waste of time
_________________
"Flash is back. Worlds will die again!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rgj
Hardcore
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Batman Begins = NOT a waste of time.
rgj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Forrest
Lowlife
Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
COMPLETELY agree, rgj! I LOVE Batman Begins!!!
Sorry, my comment should have said "DD remake = waste of time."
I think the director's cut was an exceptional film and backtracking would only ensure another box office showing like Elektra's. No, if another DD will ever be made in the next say 10 years, I'm thinking it should be a strong sequel that really doesn't build on the 1st, etc. to avoid association with the terrible theatrical cut.
_________________
"Flash is back. Worlds will die again!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rgj
Hardcore
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What is it with DD comic fans (the ones that liked the movie) going on about the director's cut? Look, people, the movie 99% of the people saw was the theatrical cut. Even, if the DC was good (and, I personally doubt it), it's still not the FIRST DD film. Like it or not the theatrical version is #1. If a DD 2 sequel is made they aren't going to base it on the "improved" DC, it's based on the theatrical version that everyone saw. And, hey, for a remake, I'd be more than happy to wait 10 years. But, that's just my humble opinion.
rgj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Forrest
Lowlife
Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rgj wrote: | | Even, if the DC was good (and, I personally doubt it) |
WAIT, have you never seen the DC?!?! 
I put off buying for about six months because the TC wasn't all that impressive to me anymore, I thought the added scenes would be trivial outtakes, etc. So wrong!!! I have NEVER seen a movie as brutally torn apart and destroyed was the TC was from the original DC.
Anyway, if you're a DD fan, you should see the DC.
_________________
"Flash is back. Worlds will die again!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Clayton Blind Love
Redemption
Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 772
Location: Beautiful British Columbia
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shame on you rgi! Shame shame shame!
You can't comment on the DC.
C.
_________________
Love is blindness, I don't want to see
Won't you wrap the night around me |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rgj
Hardcore
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, you know what they say, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." Guys there is just no way for me to see the DD:DC without giving money to FOX. And, it ain't happening with a DD product made by them. But, look, as I said, it doesn't matter if the DC was good or not. A sequel has to based on the TC, because that's what 99.9% of the public saw. Only hard core comic fans (and, only those who actually liked the movie) saw the DC. Thus, my vote. Reboot this bastard and let's see a NEW Daredevil movie. If they're doing it for Hulk, there is hope for DD.
rgj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Francesco
Underboss
Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rgj wrote: | | Guys there is just no way for me to see the DD:DC without giving money to FOX. And, it ain't happening with a DD product made by them. But, look, as I said, it doesn't matter if the DC was good or not. A sequel has to based on the TC, because that's what 99.9% of the public saw. |
He's right.
Anyway, my opinion is that:
either DD remake or sequel = waste of time (if they don't put some more effort into it).
Instead, Daredevil's image could be promoted with a neat animated series, but could this be a subject for another topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
