View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dave Wallace Paradiso
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1074 Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:42 am Post subject: Daredevil #117 solicit info |
|
|
"Return of the King" sounds even more interesting than I expected, based on the solicit info for issue #117.
From Newsarama:
Quote: | DAREDEVIL #117
Written by ED BRUBAKER
Penciled by MICHAEL LARK
Cover by MARKO DJURDJEVIC
King Variant by TBA
RETURN OF THE KING continues! Wilson Fisk, the Kingpin of Crime, comes back to Hell's Kitchen to forge a pact with Daredevil! Their target? Lady Bullseye and the Hand! By the award-winning team of Brubaker and Lark!
32 PGS./Rated T+ ...$2.99
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Francesco Underboss
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 1307
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Their target? Lady Bullseye and the Hand! |
Storylines are getting more and more dilated, it seems.
But, certainly, if it takes four or more issue to reveal who Master Izo is or even what the heck does the Hand want, a storyline could as well take up fifteen issues. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jumonji Guardian Devil

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 636 Location: Too close to the Arctic circle
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Francesco wrote: | Quote: | Their target? Lady Bullseye and the Hand! |
Storylines are getting more and more dilated, it seems.
But, certainly, if it takes four or more issue to reveal who Master Izo is or even what the heck does the Hand want, a storyline could as well take up fifteen issues. |
I kind of like that there is a natural progression from one story arc to the next. I'm not sure I liked the size of that spoiler in the solicit though. Sure, there are always spoilers but they rarely tell you outright what's going to happen. They could have shrouded that reveal in a little bit of mystery and still kept it interesting. I'm going to try to forget what I just read.
And Master Izo has been one and half issue so far. Just saying... _________________ The Other Murdock Papers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dash Flying Blind

Joined: 29 Oct 2008 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Kingpin and Daredevil shaking hands doesn't leave much to mystery.
But as far as 15 issue story arcs...it's getting a bit ridiculous. That's a whole YEAR of DD. I mean, good story or not, it drags it out a lot in my opinion. Which results in "filler" issues to prolong the story. But I'm not saying this story isn't good. I just miss the days when comics had an one issue story. When was the last stand alone DD story?
But one issue stories can be rushed and leave alot out.
So somewhere in the middle would be nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Wallace Paradiso
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1074 Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with long over-arching story elements. Yes, it seems from the solicit that Brubaker is using Lady Bullseye in a second arc after the current one, but serialised comics books like Daredevil are always going to make use of recurring cast members - Lady Bullseye just happens to be a new one.
There's nothing in the solicit to indicate that this is a direct continuation of the "Lady Bullseye" arc - just that elements of that story will play into the next arc.
If you're going to object to long story arcs on principle, we never would have had Miller's 'Elektra saga' or Bendis' run - two of the best runs on Daredevil, in my opinion. From my point of view, Brubaker's run on the book is shaping up to be a defining one too - and I don't see anything wrong with him reusing characters and concepts from one arc to another. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Wallace Paradiso
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1074 Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dash wrote: | When was the last stand alone DD story? |
Brubaker has written several. Off the top of my head, there's the Foggy issue, the Milla issue, the 100th issue, the issue involving Ben and Dakota North that occurs just after Milla is taken into hospital, the annual, and the stand-alone "Blood of the Tarantula" one-shot. That's pretty good going, I think. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jumonji Guardian Devil

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 636 Location: Too close to the Arctic circle
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dave Wallace wrote: | If you're going to object to long story arcs on principle, we never would have had Miller's 'Elektra saga' or Bendis' run - two of the best runs on Daredevil, in my opinion. From my point of view, Brubaker's run on the book is shaping up to be a defining one too - and I don't see anything wrong with him reusing characters and concepts from one arc to another. |
The above example was the first that came to mind for me when Francesco mentioned the 15 issue story arc. The Elektra saga is a good example of how you can keep plots going for a very long time, sometimes having a certain development front and center and sometimes leaving it in the background for a few issues.
I don't minds arcs seamlessly transitioning into the next. Quite the contrary, it gives a sense of an organic "other" reality where things that happen have long-reaching consequences and aren't just swiftly dismissed.
I would much rather have long story arcs (though there should be definite chapters to it) than one-shots or two-shots only, like you'd see in the old days. While there were still occasionally developments that "stuck" and ongoing relationships with the other members of the cast, I prefer the organic feel of a long arc to the sometimes disjointed long stream of one-shots. Occasional one-shots are a great way to mix things up though. _________________ The Other Murdock Papers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Wallace Paradiso
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1074 Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well said, jumonji. I agree that there should be defined chapters within the longer sagas. Otherwise, you'd just feel like you were reading a serialised graphic novel - which is not the same thing as a monthly comic book (even though there's an ever increasing tendancy to write with an eye to the eventual TPB collection rather than the single issues). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Francesco Underboss
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 1307
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't object long storyarcs on principle. If they turn up to be really good, it's okay.
You mentioned Miller and Bendis. Fair enough. Before writing that post I had exactly the stories of those two authors in mind.
They too had over-arching plots going on, like the Elektra saga.
Difference is, and now I have Bendis' run in mind, each storyarc, with maybe the exception of "Out + Hardcore" was pretty much self-conclusive while having "over-arching story elements", like you said.
The Elektra saga, can we honestly consider it a storyline? I think not. It's more an over-arching story element. Elektra comes into DD's life, and in the meantime, DD has different adventures, sometimes involving Elektra, sometimes not.
In short, I totally favor "over-arching story elements". Overly dilated storylines? Not so much.
Quote: | There's nothing in the solicit to indicate that this is a direct continuation of the "Lady Bullseye" arc - just that elements of that story will play into the next arc. |
No, you say? Maybe. Me, I'd be willing to bet money that the last part will be open-ended, effectively continuing in the next storyarc (as it was at the end of "To The Devil his Due"). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anybody else dislike that picture of the Kingpin? He looks like a fat tough guy. Well, just a fat tough guy. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Francesco Underboss
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 1307
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
james castle wrote: | Anybody else dislike that picture of the Kingpin? He looks like a fat tough guy. Well, just a fat tough guy. |
I don't particularly like it, either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dash Flying Blind

Joined: 29 Oct 2008 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I wasn't trying to say that this run isn't amazing. Because it is. And I do like that the story has kind of evolved into one big one.
But in my opinion, there have been some issues that are just numbers for numbers sake. Good books in their own right, but they seem more like stalling than anything else. But I realize that Daredevil isn't a pulse pounding non -stop adventure roller coaster. That's kind of why I like it though, it's a different comic.
But no matter how much of a filler a DD issue is, I'd still buy it. I can honestly say I'm 100% satisfied with both the art and story on DD right now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vtsoxfan7 Playing to the Camera

Joined: 31 Jan 2006 Posts: 182 Location: The 'noke, VA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jumonji wrote: | Dave Wallace wrote: | If you're going to object to long story arcs on principle, we never would have had Miller's 'Elektra saga' or Bendis' run - two of the best runs on Daredevil, in my opinion. From my point of view, Brubaker's run on the book is shaping up to be a defining one too - and I don't see anything wrong with him reusing characters and concepts from one arc to another. |
The above example was the first that came to mind for me when Francesco mentioned the 15 issue story arc. The Elektra saga is a good example of how you can keep plots going for a very long time, sometimes having a certain development front and center and sometimes leaving it in the background for a few issues.
I don't minds arcs seamlessly transitioning into the next. Quite the contrary, it gives a sense of an organic "other" reality where things that happen have long-reaching consequences and aren't just swiftly dismissed.
I would much rather have long story arcs (though there should be definite chapters to it) than one-shots or two-shots only, like you'd see in the old days. While there were still occasionally developments that "stuck" and ongoing relationships with the other members of the cast, I prefer the organic feel of a long arc to the sometimes disjointed long stream of one-shots. Occasional one-shots are a great way to mix things up though. |
I agree with Jumonji's comments. An EXCELLENT example of this is what Brubaker has done on Captain America. He just finished up the 'Death Of' story line and that had 3 'acts' to it and spanned from issue 25-40 or so. Stories that have a lasting impact or continuation into following arcs are great when done well and if anyone can do that, it's Brubaker! _________________ https://twitter.com/tburnham7
http://tburnham7.blogspot.com/
'So I've got THAT going for me...which is nice' - Bill Murray, Caddyshack |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would welcome a slightly longer arc. My complaint (that no one else seems to share somehow) is that Bru has been slamming arcs shut virtually at random very 6 issues or whatever. With a longer arc maybe he wouldn't ahve to lean on deus ex machinas so hard. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kirika Flying Blind
Joined: 05 Sep 2008 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, I have to admit that with the exception of Cruel and Unusual, I have liked just about everything I have read by Bru...most of which I was convinced from the get go I was not going to like. With this upcoming arc, I am again looking at what little info we have to go on and shaking my head. I have really enjoyed the Fisk-less days. But maybe Brubaker will prove me wrong again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|