Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


Daredevil/Matt Murdock not exactly blind?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The off-topic section
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Punisher74
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 103
Location: Carbondale, Illinois

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:25 pm    Post subject: Daredevil/Matt Murdock not exactly blind? Reply with quote

I mean his radar sense makes him see things sort of. Like he can see whatever is in front of him with his radar sense right? So he's nor exactly blind, right?
_________________
"Helpful. Cooperative. Stupid. That's my boys." Frank Castle (a.k.a. The Punisher) Welcome Back Frank Series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He's really blind, in the sense that his sight doesn't work, like that of any other totally blind man.
His powers sort of mitigate his inability to see, but he's still effectively blind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, long post! I know how much everyone likes them. Wink

First a couple of basic things:
1) In real life, there is a wide range of visual impairment ranging from just below normal vision to total blindness. Not being totally blind does not automatically make you fully sighted.

2) 10% of the legally blind (below 20/200 acuity) are totally blind, and the vast majority can see color. People at the "better" end of the legal blindness spectrum often do not use a white cane and you could pass such a person on the street and not even know that he or she was "blind." Also, most legally blind people read print and do not even know how to read Braille. The point here is that blindness is not an all or nothing thing.

So, counting his radar as a form of vision and including the ability of his other senses to fill in some of the blanks (really, colorless shapes don't tell you that much about the world around you other than where things are), is Matt totally blind? I would say no. Is he moderately to severly visually impaired? Absolutely.

One way of testing whether Matt does in fact have certain problems related to not seeing is to imagine him in something like a college classroom. Making out shapes, hearing heartbeats and smelling what everyone had for breakfast does not enable him to read blackboards, see a PowerPoint presentation, see movies, slides, or maps/pictures demonstrated by the teacher. From an academic stand point, he has much more in common with a totally blind person than a sighted person. I know that the "DD isn't really handicapped*/blind" theory is a popular one, but I would ask anyone who supports that theory if they truly believe that someone like Matt would have been successful in college without a certain amount of special accomodation - keeping in mind that even something as simple as bringing a tape recorder to class is something most universities only allow for students that have a documented disability.

Matt doesn't have any problems with mobility (quite obviously), but he most definitely has a an "access to information" disability related to his inability to see by natural means. If you can't read a street sign from five feet away, then I'd say you have a problem seeing things. Same with not being able to see a TV screen or decipher a photograph. Even reading by touch is a fairly inefficient means of information gathering. Since he can only "see" what he's touching at any one time, it would be like trying to read through a narrow tube. It's certainly doable, but for quickly scanning large amounts of text, it's inferior to natural sight.

Okay, so that was the long version. Laughing Short version: Totally blind? No (though in some ways, yes). Visually impaired? Without a doubt. In any way less credible as a superhero because of this? Not at all.

*) Bonus points to Bru for deliberately retiring the "handicapped" label, and replacing it with "disabled" (in issue #93). The latter has been the preferred term for the last thirty years or so.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers


Last edited by jumonji on Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:14 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At the risk of sounding negative again: this is one of the reasons I can't stand Stan Lee. Any time he talks about Daredevil Stan The Man goes off about how Matt is disabled and THAT'S what makes him a great hero. Which is, of course, complete nonsense. As I understand it, the "problem" with being blind is that you can't see. But it's not that you can't see, it's that you can't sense things. Blindness is a disability because those who are blind are not able to tell what's around them as easily as people who have sight. Of course Matt can tell what's around him much, much better than anyone else. He can't "see" what's in front of his eyes but he can "see" what's all around him...for blocks and blocks. He's a great deal more abled than anyone else. Once again Stan misses the point entirely.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
At the risk of sounding negative again: this is one of the reasons I can't stand Stan Lee. Any time he talks about Daredevil Stan The Man goes off about how Matt is disabled and THAT'S what makes him a great hero.

I agree with you that Stan Lee is missing the point. Being blind is not what makes Daredevil a great hero, nor is it the most interesting aspect of his character. I happen to be one of those people who do think it's rather intriguing, but that's a different matter. The problem with this coming from Stan Lee of all writers is also that he made sure to comment on Daredevil being better than a sighted man at everything every two pages, so I would say that, from how DD was written at the time, Stan Lee probably shouldn't be the one saying that.

The problem I have with what you are saying is that your response implies that there is some sort of contradition between being better than other people at some things and an inability (or diminished ability) to do certain other things. The reality of the situation is much more complex than that.

Look, the whole "my other senses more than compensate" thing is a logical fallacy of the "it doesn't matter that I can't see the movie since I know what everyone in the theater had for breakfast" variety. In reality, his senses usually compensate, very often over-compensate and quite frequently don't compensate at all (or fully). The whole problem, from Matt's perspective, is not who would be the most "abled" in the absolute sense of the word, but that society is built around people whose senses work differently from his. In an office setting, being able to see a computer screen is probably more relevant than being able to tell what people are talking about three floors away.

He is disabled and "super-abled" at the same time. There is no contradiction between these two concepts. None at all.

UPDATED: I don't want to hi-jack this thread any further (and it is an interesting issue) so this will proably be my last post. However, I would ask you this, JC: Do you acknowledge that there are certain tasks for which Matt's abilities are useless and irrelevant (i.e. don't make up for the fact that he's effectively 100% color blind and can't read anything he's not physically touching)? If so, do you also acknowledge that some of these tasks are of the kind that people are normally expected to be able to perform and that an inability to perform a given task might - at the very least - be experienced as an inconvenience? Go into a bookstore and take out all the color information, and I will guarantee you that someone with decent eyes can find what they are looking for ten times faster.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dimetre
Underboss


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1366
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One thing I always found cool about Daredevil's blindness is that it actually seemed to liberate him at times. He would jump off the top of a skyscraper with no trepidation, with thought bubbles about his current adventure popping out of his head all the way down. I always thought he could do that because he couldn't see how frightening what he was doing actually was.

I thought Denny O'Neill explored this beautifully in #223. (An issue that lost in the first round in the recent stand-alone contest. Pppph!) The second the Beyonder gave Daredevil the ability to see, he became completely uncoordinated. I always thought his inability to see freed him, and allowed him to operate with very little fear, and seemingly completely without it. I think he's oblivious to many of the serious risks he takes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Neilan
Tree of Knowledge


Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 216
Location: Southampton, PA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dimetre wrote:
One thing I always found cool about Daredevil's blindness is that it actually seemed to liberate him at times. He would jump off the top of a skyscraper with no trepidation, with thought bubbles about his current adventure popping out of his head all the way down. I always thought he could do that because he couldn't see how frightening what he was doing actually was.


Well, I believe that no less an authority than Stan Lee, himself, would agree with you. Even my faulty memory recalls Stan having DD think to himself, the thoughts that you mention, that he could never do those death defying leaps off of buildings if he could see what he was doing.
_________________
It's never too late to have a happy childhood!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
staringatangels
Flying Blind


Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 2
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:08 pm    Post subject: daredevil blind? Reply with quote

Is Dardevil really blind? I don't think that's really the important question so much as how does the comic handle his abilities and lack thereof?

I feel that the comic really doesn't explore the issues Christine mentioned, so that his "powers" do tend to portray him as over-compensated to the point of him appearing not to be blind, or of his blindness not really mattering.

I am legally blind myself, though I have enough vision to read the comic without assistive technology (though it can be hard sometimes, especially with those old, faded comics!). So Christine has a good point that "legal blindness" encompasses a broad range of visual ability, but when we speak of blindness we generally mean someone without any sight at all or hardly any really useful vision. This is the condition I believe Daredevil is meant to be in, and yet his radar sense and other heightened senses tend to negate whatever obstacles he usually faces, at least in his career as a superhero.

We don't get much of how his blindness affects his personal life. Most of that is taken up with his lovelife or how he deals with people like Foggy (which may be indirectly related to his condition, but it's hard to say).

I feel that Stan Lee had a good idea that didn't really get explored in the way that he thought it would work, though I still give props to him for coming up with the idea in the first place. And DD is still a great comic, deficiencies aside.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, so I said I'd stay out of this thread after my first couple of posts, right? Yeah... That's not going to happen. Wink

Because staringatangels brings up another aspect in all of this that (probably) contributes a great deal to how people view this aspect of the character. I have always based my own personal assessment of what Matt's abilities and (yes) "disabilities" should be based on simple logic. To me, it's simply a matter of looking at his powers and lack thereof and doing a little real-life simulation in your head. When you do that it's obvious that his powers (even when you take them to their most extreme) do not, in fact, compensate for every situation where good vision is required, or at least preferred. I would even say that many of these situations are very common and would be of the kind he would find himself in every single day. Being 100% color blind (a condition which, of course, doesn't exist in real life without the person also being functionally totally blind) is not merely a matter of esthetics. Color carries an enormous amount of information about the world around you which most people rely on heavily to recognize what things are (not everything has a distinctive shape, scent or sound).

However (and this is where I get to the point of not simply repeating what I've said before), the book has always been written as if the problems associated with Matt's rather unique "condition" didn't exist. He's had his share of "blind moments," but these are incredibly few and far in between. They have also been almost exclusively restricted to his in costume activitites when it really should be Matt - out of costume - who gets stuck with the lion's share of the rather obvious inconvenience of not seeing normally. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the whole concept of how and why Daredevil works as a superhero is awesome. The way his senses work to his advantage when engaging in battle, throwing himself of buildings, tracking people and picking up on subtle clues that others may have missed make perfect sense to me. The whole concept actually works. He's a very believable character in this sense.

Where the concept doesn't work is when they are trying to sell the idea that not seeing (normally) is never a problem. It would be. Yes, even in the Marvel U. Unfortunately, most writers would never be willing to touch this issue with a ten foot pole, and instead it becomes the proverbial elephant in the room. I'm not actually suggesting that writers deliberately play this up, just not pretending that the elephant isn't there would be quite enough. Incidentally, I think Brubaker has been the best writer so far at not having Matt do things he shouldn't be able to, so it's obvious that this can be done without messing with the feel of the book.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:54 am    Post subject: Re: daredevil blind? Reply with quote

staringatangels wrote:
Is Dardevil really blind? I don't think that's really the important question so much as how does the comic handle his abilities and lack thereof?


First off, welcome to the boards, staringatangels Wink.

Quote:
I feel that the comic really doesn't explore the issues Christine mentioned, so that his "powers" do tend to portray him as over-compensated to the point of him appearing not to be blind, or of his blindness not really mattering.

[...]

We don't get much of how his blindness affects his personal life. Most of that is taken up with his lovelife or how he deals with people like Foggy (which may be indirectly related to his condition, but it's hard to say).


In my opinion, exploring those issues would be a little problematic. First of all, "Daredevil" is, in the end, a book - peculiar as you want it to be - about a superhero. The most important aspect is not the fact that DD/Matt is blind, but, rather, his struggle to selflessly stand between the innocents and the evildoers. The decisions he has to make in this struggle. The often terrible consequences of the path he has chosen.

The fact that his powers are so unusual and even the fact that he has become blind in the process of obtaining them, becomes, in the light of this, of a secondary importance.

The authors could also explore a little more his condition of blind person, and all the everyday problems that this condition implies, but this, besides not being the most urgent aspect of the book, could end up being a pointless exercise.
I, as a fan, can well imagine the ways in which his blindness affects his everyday life (probably mostly in the form of limited access to visual information) and maybe write a couple of fanfics about it, but the writer of the comic shouldn't indulge in this for the sake of it.
After all, the near totality of DD readers already know, or at least can effectively imagine what, as a blind, Matt can or can't do in his everyday life, without the writer having to point it out just for a supposed necessity "exploring the character's blindness".

The very important thing, in my opinion, about Matt's blindness is the fact the authors should always keep it in mind, in order to avoid mistakes and to constantly give the reader a vision of the character that is coherent with his premises.


Quote:
I feel that Stan Lee had a good idea that didn't really get explored in the way that he thought it would work, though I still give props to him for coming up with the idea in the first place. And DD is still a great comic, deficiencies aside.


I completely agree with you on this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All good points Francesco (though I know you weren't talking to me, I just sort of like to write long posts about stuff and saw this as an opportunity to clarify my own points... Wink ).

I agree with you that this area shouldn't be explored for the sake of exploring it, because that would (as you say) seem a little odd to most readers and would take the focus off what's really important and what the book is basically about. It would also be counter-productive. However, I would also say that Matt's blindness has often been denied to the point of ridiculousness (though this is mostly restricted to Vol 1 issues). At the end of the day, any themes having to do with this (or other aspects, such as his Catholicism) need to be seamlessly integrated into the book when appropriate, not treated as separate plot elements. One good example of this was something as simple as showing Matt and Milla having a talking caller I.D. in issue #95. Little things like that are more than enough as I see it. It's a cool, completely natural little thing that does not in any way detract from the story but adds a dose of realism. (And I would still like for the current team to give the poor guy a computer, for the exact same reason. No need to make a big deal out of that either.)

As for whether readers realize that Matt's blindness does have actual ramifications to the point of appropriately being labeled as a disability, it's obvious that many do not. Whether or not writers need to educate them about this is another question. With this primarily being a superhero comic, I would say no. Nothing that isn't relevant to the plot should be shoe-horned in, regardless of what it is. But, I would still say that many (or even most) writers have gone further out of their way than they really had to in order to avoid the issue at all cost, and that's what I was referring to with my "elephant in the room" analogy. There is a happy medium in there somewhere, and I think Brubaker comes extremely close to striking the perfect balance. And, he does so without specifically bringing it up at all. Not denying Matt's blindness is not the same as making a big deal about it (and I don't think that was what staringatangels was suggesting either). The latter would be a distraction, seem completely out of context, and be outside of the focus of the book.

The key here is to find the balance of having this aspect be seemlessly integrated without being high-lighted, the same way every other aspect of the character should be handled. In fact, I would point to Kevin Smith's Guardian Angel as a perfect example of taking what should have been a seemlessly integrated part of the character (his Catholicism) and high-lighting it to the point of being completely distracting and almost out-of-character. This just goes to show that there is a right way and a wrong way to do this. Not a big Kevin Smith fan, as you can clearly see... Wink
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Darediva
Wake Up


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1208
Location: Hell's Kitchen South, Arkansas, USA

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would like to say that I agree that Brubaker has integrated some of the challenges blind people would face in reality into the fictional world of Matt Murdock. He's done so without making it the focal point; rather he uses the situations to add to the believability of the story.

[Spoiler]


Case in point: When Matt rushes into his home and finds the nurse beaten and bloodied, he does not appear to locate her immediately, as a sighted person would definitely see the blood everywhere and the woman on the floor. He had more of a panic-stricken reaction because he thought it would be Milla who had been harmed. It added a lot to the tension and shock of the scene, to me.
[end spoiler]

Contrast this to some of the things we see in the early days of the comic, when Matt is shown using his cane not only in his office, but also in his own home! Come on! That's just plain ridiculous. Not that most people think about this kind of stuff, but it sort of grates a little on people who know blind people can navigate just fine, thank you, in a familiar space. It was just shown in that ham-fisted manner to drive home the point that Matt is a blind guy. Sort of like the melodramatic junk with Karen always thinking "Poor Matt. If he weren't BLIND, he would know how much I care." (Pardon me while I gag.)

Brubaker gives us the modern view that disabled people can hold decent jobs. That little discourse at the dinner table when Becky was invited to be a partner in the law firm was priceless. Thanks for acknowledging the elephant, and that he's not a fearsome beast.
_________________
Alice




Those who throw dirt merely lose ground.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
staringatangels
Flying Blind


Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 2
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:30 am    Post subject: Re: daredevil blind? Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:

First off, welcome to the boards, staringatangels Wink.


Thank you. One of these days I'll get around to one of those intro thingies. But honestly, this is one of the only threads that has really sparked my interest anyway.

Quote:
In my opinion, exploring those issues would be a little problematic. First of all, "Daredevil" is, in the end, a book - peculiar as you want it to be - about a superhero. The most important aspect is not the fact that DD/Matt is blind, but, rather, his struggle to selflessly stand between the innocents and the evildoers. The decisions he has to make in this struggle. The often terrible consequences of the path he has chosen.


This marks a huge divergence of opinion between myself and how most other DD fans seem to view the book. In many of the older issues, the first block of text reads: "He dwells in eternal night - but the blackness is filled with sounds and scents other men cannot perceive. Though attorney MATT MURDOCK is blind, his other senses function with superhuman sharpness - his radar sense guides him over every obstacle!"

For me, it is obvious that the character's blindness is being used as a distinctive, important feature, and is contrasted with these superhuman powers that "compensate" for what his lack of sight has taken away from him. It thus also inextricably connects his superhero status with his blindness - DD isn't just a superhero, he's a blind superhero.

If this were not the case, why make him blind in the first place? There was a show called The Sentinnel which featured characters who were able to develop all of their senses to extremely heightened levels, way beyond that of normal humans, in ways very similar to DD. From what I remember, none of those people were blind or had any other major disability.

I understand that the comic, as the story of a superhero, shouldn't be bogged down with boring depictions of what happens to him in everyday life. Still, because we do get snapshots of his everyday life, I don't understand why most of that gets taken up with which woman's pants he's trying to get into (or what woman he's pining over), rather than portray some situations that might add some extra dimension to Matt's personality, help our psychological understanding of him, and explore the issue of disability, something that to my knowledge hasn't been dealt with a lot in comics (and correct me if I'm wrong, but sex and romance has).

I think it would also be interesting to see DD encounter more problems AS A SUPERHERO because of his disability. This happens a little, but usually DD ends up kicking butt in the end (to all of our delight, I admit). Still, when DD is bested, it's usually because of some anger management or impulsivity issue.

Quote:
After all, the near totality of DD readers already know, or at least can effectively imagine what, as a blind, Matt can or can't do in his everyday life, without the writer having to point it out just for a supposed necessity "exploring the character's blindness".


You may feel that way, but I, for one, must respectfully disagree. From personal experience, most people, even those who know me well, have little understanding of what it's like to live with a disability. That's understandable. But I have also encountered people with gross assumptions. Many, perhaps most, people attempt to understand my situation, what accommodations are necessary, and what things are unnecessary.

One of the most common things I hear is "Wow, I can't imagine what it would be like to live like that. I don't know if I could live without having as much sight as I do now."

And I'm not even close to being completely blind. I still have fairly good mobility, I just have trouble seeing small details or things from a certain distance. This prevents me from being able to drive and doing certain physical tasks, and in some areas makes some activities more difficult, but I can do many of the same things as someone with 20/20 vision.

I don't feel that I can really imagine what it's like to be completely blind. Every time I am around people with visual impairments much more severe than my own, I learn a heck of a lot, and find out many of my own assumptions were wrong.

So can people really imagine what DD's life is like without exploring how his blindness affects him more? Perhaps, but I for one don't think that's the case.

Sorry if this post sounds a little "on my high horse-ish," I don't mean it to be. I'm not saying these things in the name of political correctness, or even in an outrage that I feel my "group" of disabled people has been misrepresented. All I'm saying is that I feel the premise of the comic places DD's issues with sight as an essential part of his character, and yet the actual comic doesn't come through on that well. Does that mean that I'll stop reading DD? Nope. Does it mean that I am a little disappointed in it in some aspects? Yep.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Darediva
Wake Up


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1208
Location: Hell's Kitchen South, Arkansas, USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:17 am    Post subject: Re: daredevil blind? Reply with quote

staringatangels wrote:


This marks a huge divergence of opinion between myself and how most other DD fans seem to view the book. In many of the older issues, the first block of text reads: "He dwells in eternal night - but the blackness is filled with sounds and scents other men cannot perceive. Though attorney MATT MURDOCK is blind, his other senses function with superhuman sharpness - his radar sense guides him over every obstacle!"

For me, it is obvious that the character's blindness is being used as a distinctive, important feature, and is contrasted with these superhuman powers that "compensate" for what his lack of sight has taken away from him. It thus also inextricably connects his superhero status with his blindness - DD isn't just a superhero, he's a blind superhero.


That was the hook that Stan Lee created with DD, and I agree with you that it was what originally made Daredevil different. What I believe is that writers after Stan were sometimes uncomfortable with addressing that part of his character, and I do consider it to still be an important part of it now.

Quote:
I understand that the comic, as the story of a superhero, shouldn't be bogged down with boring depictions of what happens to him in everyday life. Still, because we do get snapshots of his everyday life, I don't understand why most of that gets taken up with which woman's pants he's trying to get into (or what woman he's pining over), rather than portray some situations that might add some extra dimension to Matt's personality, help our psychological understanding of him, and explore the issue of disability, something that to my knowledge hasn't been dealt with a lot in comics (and correct me if I'm wrong, but sex and romance has).


Well said. Again, I agree. Maybe it's because it just doesn't SELL as well as sex and romance?

Quote:
I think it would also be interesting to see DD encounter more problems AS A SUPERHERO because of his disability. This happens a little, but usually DD ends up kicking butt in the end (to all of our delight, I admit). Still, when DD is bested, it's usually because of some anger management or impulsivity issue.


True enough.

Quote:
From personal experience, most people, even those who know me well, have little understanding of what it's like to live with a disability. That's understandable. But I have also encountered people with gross assumptions. Many, perhaps most, people attempt to understand my situation, what accommodations are necessary, and what things are unnecessary.

One of the most common things I hear is "Wow, I can't imagine what it would be like to live like that. I don't know if I could live without having as much sight as I do now."

And I'm not even close to being completely blind. I still have fairly good mobility, I just have trouble seeing small details or things from a certain distance. This prevents me from being able to drive and doing certain physical tasks, and in some areas makes some activities more difficult, but I can do many of the same things as someone with 20/20 vision.

I don't feel that I can really imagine what it's like to be completely blind. Every time I am around people with visual impairments much more severe than my own, I learn a heck of a lot, and find out many of my own assumptions were wrong.

So can people really imagine what DD's life is like without exploring how his blindness affects him more? Perhaps, but I for one don't think that's the case.


It certainly affects every aspect of his life, in my opinion. There is no getting around that fact to me.

Quote:
Sorry if this post sounds a little "on my high horse-ish," I don't mean it to be. I'm not saying these things in the name of political correctness, or even in an outrage that I feel my "group" of disabled people has been misrepresented. All I'm saying is that I feel the premise of the comic places DD's issues with sight as an essential part of his character, and yet the actual comic doesn't come through on that well. Does that mean that I'll stop reading DD? Nope. Does it mean that I am a little disappointed in it in some aspects? Yep.


You certainly didn't come off sounding like that to me.

What started out to be one of DD's distinguishing characteristics has in some writers' hands been almost ignored. Some have been a lot better at handling it than others. I have high regard so far in the way Brubaker is working with it in his character study of Matt Murdock. I hope we can continue to find this type of writing to continue in the title.

And, welcome to the board!
_________________
Alice




Those who throw dirt merely lose ground.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Sorry if this post sounds a little "on my high horse-ish," I don't mean it to be.


No, staringatangels, no prob Wink. Rather, it is I who maybe sounded a little harsh when I explained why, to me, exploring Matt's blindness with more dedication is of a lesser importance.

I'll comment your post more appropriately later.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The off-topic section All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group