|
Daredevil Message Board The Board Without Fear!
|
The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rgj Hardcore
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1580 Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jc wrote: | Even so: the man with out hope/fear thing is about giving up hope for yourself. Matt cares about others but he is fearless because he wants nothing for himself. |
Seeing as Matt was nuts during the first half of this arc, how do you assert that Matt "gave up hope for himself." Clearly, someone who's gone temporarily bonkers doesn't have the capacity to choose. I didn't see anywhere where Matt said "I'm giving up all hope. I do this freely. I want nothing for myself." Clearly you equate hope with "god" when you hear the famous line. But, that line wasn't uttered by a nutty Matt. It was uttered by the KP. A KP who was growing paranoid wondering what this "nothing left to loose, fearless man" might now do. How paranoid was KP. Paranoid enough to massacre innocent people to flush out Matt.
As far as this God didn't put on Matt's bandages thing (which I hear are great for stab wounds and internal bleeding, I'm sure--not that I'm saying this proves God was there, but rather that Miller over did it) goes, yeah, Matt did say, "They've done some work on me."
The "Prasie God, he's alive" splash page obvioulsly happens after Maggie and whoever drags him (unconscious) to the church and they do the best they can for his wounds. But, the fever that later begins to overtake him is a direct result of all his pervious injuries and pneumonia (as blood loss amplies the state of being immunocompromised). It is clear that this is the time where Matt's life hanged in the balance, where life or death were both possibilities. This is where Miller put Maggie's prayer.
Now, like I said, it could have been dumb luck. Or the antibiotics and type specific blood units in Maggie's habbit. Or, if you want, that Santa did his thing. Matt was "clearly going to die." He didn't. Just because you don't believe in a Godly force in real life doesn't mean Miller didn't mean to hint at one. Or hint at various things, Santa being one.
rgj |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Look, just to get things straigh here: what you and Stanley are saying is that the an powerful creator of the universe that is both omnipresent and omnipotent literally (within the confines of the comic) came down and stopped Matt's fever. That the Christian God played a central role in Born Again. And not just themeatically, and not just as an idea but as an actual character just like Matt or Ben or Captain America or Foggy. You're saying that Born Again is actually a story about Matt and Karen and the Kingpin and a very literal and very active Christian God who plays a key role in the story.
Okay, I know that you're saying "well, it could possibly be about that" but that doesn't make a difference.
Why? Because it's ludicris. Read the frickin' comic. The idea that a Christian God is literally a character who walks around (admittedly off panel) and is engaged in the story is just flat out ridiculous. It's ridiculous. An actual character. Part of the cast. Ridiculous.
And no, I don't equate god with hope. I do equate him with boring stories in which every character in them would be literally fearless. If god really is riding shotgun who would fear anything? And we're not talking about a vague, sense of a godly force. We're talking about an actual individual who sits around listening to prayers and then taking direct, tylonol type action. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jim B. Playing to the Camera

Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 124 Location: Woodstock Ontario
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Personally I always felt that scene was meant to be decided for yourself by the reader of the story. It is not a cut and dried thing/fact like "Daredevil's suit is red" I don't feel that Miller is saying flat out that Maggie prayed for Matt and for that reason God saved him and he got better. He may have gotten better on his own. But he is definetly implying it by the fact Matt was really sick and could die until after she prayed for him he "miraculously" was well again.
I don't think you are really supposed to know if it really happened or didn't happen actually. You are just left to wonder "Was he saved by divine intervention or not? Wow that was kind of cool, what an awesome story" It may just be like others have said a touching scene showing a woman who has faith in her God and love and care for a man who may be her son (Yes I know Kevin Smith said she really was his Mother but I am choosing to ignore that and Guardian Devil until the end of time ) and that's all. It just in how you interpret it. _________________ "This isn't hell, but you can see it from here." -The Crow |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
train Guardian Devil
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 659 Location: Hell's Pantry
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Francesco wrote: |
Also, that page is certainly mirable, but as Castle said. there are way more important themes in that storyline. |
I don't disagree at all with this statement. However, JC suggests that the religeous overtones have no place in the story. And still clings to the man without hope is a man without fear "theme". as jumonji stated above, it's more about when you lose the things that you think are imporant does it "reset" your life. To find that Matt still a hero and makes the right choices after having everything stripped from him is the point. Not the fact that he's without hope. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rgj Hardcore
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1580 Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jc wrote: | Why? Because it's ludicris. Read the frickin' comic. The idea that a Christian God is literally a character who walks around (admittedly off panel) and is engaged in the story is just flat out ridiculous. It's ridiculous. An actual character. Part of the cast. Ridiculous. |
Yeah, I read the comic. Matt is dying. Maggie prays to the Christian God (we know he's the Christian God because Maggie is a nun, they've used the word Catholic and priests can be seen in parts of the city). So, Matt is dying and Maggie prays and Matt survives.
I understand, that in "real" life it would be "ludicrus." At least, no rational man would believe such voodoo (which exists in the Marvel U. too). But, this is a frickin' comic where Thor and Loki and Hurcules (if you want another denomination) exist. So, how do you know specifically that Miller left no room for the existance of the Christian God. What, just 'cause he doesn't have a giant hammer? Doesn't have an entry on the Marvel Universe Handbook (imagine the "power level" on Him! But, I'm sure Wolverine could still best him hand to hand!) Look, Miller left this vague, even you can't deny that--unless you apply your "real" world view, no? If he didn't want the reader to make up his own mind he would have written it in stone. I'm surprised no one has ever asked Miller about this in an interview.
Look, it's ludicrus to you because it's ludicrus to you in real life. Plain and simple. Don't pretend it's because "God", the character (and he is quite a charcater even in his own book), didn't have a proper entrance (you know, scenes with him on his cloud (?), guess you're an art fan).
By the way, it too is ludicrus that Matt could survive his injuries.
Look, like I said for the millionth time. Whatever floats your particular boat. If you like dumb luck, then go for it. Perhaps it was the Beyonder (you've seen him with your own eyes, no jc?). No ridiculous leap of faith there.
jc wrote: | If god really is riding shotgun who would fear anything? And we're not talking about a vague, sense of a godly force. |
Okay, now we've definitley crossed over to "real" world. Now, I know I'm just a lapsed Catholic and don't pretend to know as much as jc who has a degree in philosphy, but how do you get this idea that people who believe in God are fearless? I always thought it was the atheist that was fearless (one of the better qualites of being atheist). No fear of hell. No fear of God. No fear of paying for "sins." Don't have to forgive everyone because God demands it and if you don't you're in troube. I guess jc doesn't understand that when God rides shotgun he's more of a Department of Public Saftey Officer and you just don't know if you are going to get you liscense to drive. Fearless? Whatever. Hell, even Jesus Christ was afraid, and according to the book he was the Big Cheese's son.
Let's keep this conversation to the comic.
rgj |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stanley Tree of Knowledge
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 293 Location: Houston, TX.
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
james castle wrote: | Look, just to get things straigh here: what you and Stanley are saying is that the an powerful creator of the universe that is both omnipresent and omnipotent literally (within the confines of the comic) came down and stopped Matt's fever. That the Christian God played a central role in Born Again. And not just themeatically, and not just as an idea but as an actual character just like Matt or Ben or Captain America or Foggy. You're saying that Born Again is actually a story about Matt and Karen and the Kingpin and a very literal and very active Christian God who plays a key role in the story. |
I never said God 'literally' did anything other than save Matt. You're imposing your own methods here, and I'll grant you you can spin this off and say, 'well, what other way would he save Matt?', but how about this--much like people say God saved them in a situation where the outcome is vastly different than the parameters preceding it, he doesn't actually appear.
I think the only one being 'very literal' is you, and it's to your detriment.
james castle wrote: | Why? Because it's ludicris (sic). Read the frickin' comic. The idea that a Christian God is literally a character who walks around (admittedly off panel) and is engaged in the story is just flat out ridiculous. It's ridiculous. An actual character. Part of the cast. Ridiculous. |
Yeah. It is. You're the one who imposed this idea, spinning it off from our words. Never said God was a character, and I personally don't care about Thor and thus wouldn't try to use him in an argument.
Let's just concentrate on interpreting what I do say.
james castle wrote: | And we're not talking about a vague, sense of a godly force. |
Why not? I might be. For having such a raw, visceral reaction against the very idea of using God, are you really the one in an optimal position to split hairs here? After all, you took "God saves Matt" and turned it into "so you're telling me he physically walked in and performed complex surgery on Matt. GOD IS NOT A DOCTOR!"
...This is only a slight exaggeration.
***
As for the whole 'endorsed by God' bit, which was actually mentioned in a post before that too (so I'm surprised it took this long to come up), I mean endorse in the sense that:
You manage a few employees. One comes to you with an idea, and you let him continue with that idea through (at the very least) inaction. When it comes right down to it, you've endorsed this idea. You've endorsed your employee.
God saves Matt because he does act 'as a spear of lightning in [God's] hand'. Every subsequent action will be a result of being saved. God does indeed give Matt his okay--because he could've just let him die.
If Maggie's prayer had gone down the exact same way and Matt died, I would totally tell you God let Matt die.
...Somehow, I don't think you'd have a problem with that, since it's a negative on the Big Guy's board.
I'm curious as to the hope/fear discussion. Fire up another thread, plz. I think I'm not seeing what you see as so important, and I'm willing to be convinced.
As to this point, that God saved Matt, I don't think I can be moved. Just saying. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rgj Hardcore
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1580 Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are a few points jc and I have disagreed on (by the way, I forgot to comend jc on his zing at the DD movie, always a nice touch). We've disagreed on Elektra as it pertains to her being "infected" by evil, which Chichester badly claimed. We have a different opinion on the MWoF "Elektra." And, then there is this Born Again/God/No God/A man without hope . . . stuff.
Look, jc says he doesn't equate god with hope (when applied to the quote). But, that's not true. In previous back and forths, I clearly recall jc claiming that since Matt is "hopless" he is 1) an atheist and 2) God has nothing to do with BA. I clearly remember his arguemnt that did equate hope with God. Heck, even in this thead he said something to the effect that "god is all hopey." Or somehting like that.
Seriously, I just don't see how this quote puts the last nail in the coffin of confirming that this has story eliminates God or proves that Matt is atheist or whatever the point was.
Perhaps a reminder. Maybe for another thead as Stanley suggested.
rgj |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Katerine Flying Blind
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 45 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a little confused... what exactly are we arguing about here? When this thread first started, it seemed to be about Matt's religious beliefs and devoutness (or lack thereof), but now it seems to be about God's place in the MU (which actually exists, or doesn't exist, entirely independently of Matt).
Personally, it's been a long time since I've read Born Again, but from what I recall, the entire question of whether God had a hand in Matt's recovery was left at just that: a question. Just like real life, actually. And just like real life, people could read into it and come up with a number of different interpretations, which is exactly the way it should be. Regardless of whether you see God interfering in the comic or not, though, it doesn't detract from the human elements of that part of the story - they still exist, either way.
I'm far more interested in Matt's own views when it comes to the comics, myself. Personally, I see him as a lost person. So much has happened to him, he doesn't know what to believe, and the avenues that used to be open to him (I'm particularly thinking of confession) aren't open to him anymore, I don't think. Between the outing, and more importantly, the fact that Karen was killed in a church (I think it might have even been his church), I don't think he's able to seek guidance there anymore, and this has contributed a lot to the sense of chaos and loss in his life. He used to have a place to go for guidance and hope, and he doesn't anymore.
It's really quite sad... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Someone start a "What's the Point of Born Again Anyway?" thread and I'll start kicking ass and takin' names. And lucky me, everyone's name is already listed beside their posts. Etc. Etc.
As for this godly debate:
My position is this: Matt gets hurt. His mother (who is a nun) brings him to her chruch's hostile where they patch him up. He starts to feel okay. He gets a fever. Maggie, the nun, thinks that no earthly force can save him. Maggie, the nun, prays for her son in a very touching scene that indicates that she feels guilty for something she has done in her past. Matt's fever breaks. Maggie, the nun, thinks god did it. The only suggestion that god might be involved comes from Maggie, the nun.
Given the above it literally never even crossed my mind that Matt got better with god's help. I never even thought anyone thought that until this thread. Mind you, this is even true about the first time I read the thing when I was in my teens - a point in my life when I was much less anti-religious (though I didn't believe in god (I was a teenager after all)).
I think there's a lot of factors that contribute to my position. Frank Miller's work, for example. I can't believe people think Frank Miller snuck a Deus Ex Machina into Born Again. Plus, Born Again as a whole. Again, I just can't believe people think an important part of Born Again is god showing up.
Those things aside, I think the biggest reason it never occured to me that god was in Born Again was that god isn't in Born Again. There is just no evidence he's there. There just isn't. The strongest piece of evidence is that Matt got better. But there's an explaination for that (the "work" done by the nuns or whoever). Plus, he got better before his fever without god's help. So that doesn't really get you anywhere.
rgj says I'm applying "real world" thinking too much. I don't think so. However, I am applying the same thought process that I would apply to people who think god exists in the real world. It's like this:
In real life when someone is like "God rocks! Oh yeah! Plus, he totally exists in the real world!" one says "really? do you have any evidence of that?". Of course they never do. Sometimes they go "but the world exists. that's proof". And then one says "but there's for that". So it isn't really proof.
It's the same here. Everyone is saying "God totally exists in Born Again" and I say "really? do you have any evidence of that?". Of course no one does.
So it's not that I'm applying a real world standard. It's just that I'm applying a normal argument. I'd say the same thing if someone claimed Wolverine was in Born Again. He isn't.
I think why we've run into such loggerheads is that just we are applying different standards of "proof" or interpretation. One thing that surely everyone can agree on is that the idea of proof or interpretation gets relaxed when people start to god-out. Half a page of dialogue from a nun and everyone thinks god is central to the story. Sigh.
Oh yeah, and I'll also say that the religious amoung also have a cute way of clinging to questions as proof. "God might be there so he is". Um. Not really. "It's open for people to take what they want from it". The battle cry of the people who want to take what they want no matter how unfounded.
As for Stanley: look it's nice that the board has been a bit more fun over the past few days and I don't mean to put a damper on that. At the same time I have no idea what you're saying.
He saved Matt how?
Quote: |
much like people say God saved them in a situation where the outcome is vastly different than the parameters preceding it, he doesn't actually appear. |
Yeah, that gets you all sorts of nowhere. Either he directly intervenes (hence causing the parameters to change) or he doesn't.
The endorsed stuff makes even less sense.
Let's debate Born Again. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stanley Tree of Knowledge
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 293 Location: Houston, TX.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
james castle wrote: | My position is this...The only suggestion that god might be involved comes from Maggie, the nun. |
Lucid point. Here's mine.
Maggie was next to him, giving him the (let's go ahead and assume it) secular, standard care he required to get better the first time ("Praise God, he's alive!"). If she's performing medically standard practices (an assumption you'd have to come with me on, otherwise she'd have prayed him back to health the first time and I win), then her statement of 'no earthly force can stop it' is not really as subjective as you make it out to be.
james castle wrote: | Given the above it literally never even crossed my mind that Matt got better with god's help.
I think there's a lot of factors that contribute to my position. Frank Miller's work, for example. I can't believe people think Frank Miller snuck a Deus Ex Machina into Born Again. Plus, Born Again as a whole. Again, I just can't believe people think an important part of Born Again is god showing up.
Those things aside, I think the biggest reason it never occured to me that god was in Born Again was that god isn't in Born Again. |
There's a difference between 'can't' and 'don't want to'. It's not that you can't find evidence or believe that people think this way, it's that you're not even attempting to try.
Karen equates Matt to 'a god' when he puts the costume on and dances across rooftops. Ben Urich makes a point of saying "a voice that could command a god...and does". For someone attempting to say that nobody from my camp understands literary devices, you sure missed out on the obvious fact that Miller at least wants you to think about God and Daredevil's relationship with him.
Look, Matt makes a miraculous recovery. It's on the heels of Maggie's prayer. 'God saves Matt' isn't nearly as much of a stretch as you're making it. Unexplainable things happen. You don't have to attribute it to God, but begrudging someone else deciding to is a douche move.
And like I said, I'm not even religious either. I'm not some parrot chucking circular reasoning at you. I'm answering your points.
james castle wrote: | One thing that surely everyone can agree on is that the idea of proof or interpretation gets relaxed when people start to god-out. |
Hey, back on the same page.
james castle wrote: | Half a page of dialogue from a nun and everyone thinks god is central to the story. Sigh. |
...'Everyone'? Is this how you argue at your job?
james castle wrote: | Someone start a "What's the Point of Born Again Anyway?" thread and I'll start kicking ass and takin' names. |
For the most part, you might. However, you've had a few hours to understand points the way I ordinarily make them, and you're having trouble responding.
So much so that you don't even want to start the thread. You have a viewpoint of 'the point' of the novel, tell me what it is. I even asked nicely the first time.
...Or are you pulling a Stephan on us?
***
Before you respond, I've got your template here:
future james castle wrote: | Hahahhhahaha.
I still just can't believe that [INSERT RANDOM IDEA ABOUT 'GOD WALKING AROUND OFF PANEL']. I mean, I know you never said it, and I know you make sense, but I'd just rather parry your points to the side and make a blanket statement like "it doesn't make sense".
..."Endorse"? I still don't get it.
Hahahhahaaha. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stanley wrote: |
james castle wrote: | Someone start a "What's the Point of Born Again Anyway?" thread and I'll start kicking ass and takin' names. |
For the most part, you might. However, you've had a few hours to understand points the way I ordinarily make them, and you're having trouble responding.
So much so that you don't even want to start the thread. You have a viewpoint of 'the point' of the novel, tell me what it is. I even asked nicely the first time.
...Or are you pulling a Stephan on us?
|
Fair point. I'll start the thread but not for a couple days. I'm gonna re-read Born Again (in class Ominbus form) first so I can have loads of ammo.
Also: this is how I argue on the job. From my experience clients rarely like it when you say "Well, my client may have committed the crime but I don't think so". They like "he didn't do it" much better. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rgj Hardcore
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1580 Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Look forward to the thread!!
If you'd like, you can throw in a "Matt was/wasn't insane in #226 "Warriors" statement. That way we can have a free for all and battle on all sorts of fronts!
Perhaps, all participants should clarify, as well, what "For I have shown him, a man without hope is a man without fear," means to them.
rgj |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Katerine Flying Blind
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 45 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm just going to focus on the one thing that looks like it might be at least partially directed at me. 'Cause, honestly, I don't much care about this whole argument - it all seems kind of silly to me.
james castle wrote: | Oh yeah, and I'll also say that the religious amoung also have a cute way of clinging to questions as proof. "God might be there so he is". Um. Not really. "It's open for people to take what they want from it". The battle cry of the people who want to take what they want no matter how unfounded. |
In my case, I never argued, "God might be there so he is." What I actually argued was, "God might be there. Full stop."
What I was trying to do was introduce pure logic into this argument, so that everybody else could have a common ground to go on. When looked at from a purely logical standpoint, the only possible conclusion you can draw is this one:
"There is not enough information."
That's it. Which is, again, exactly the way it should be. It would be weird if there was actually enough information to say, definitively, that God either was or was not present. Why? Because that is not the way life is. And also, it would be weird because this is literature. And literature is, by nature, subjective. There are many conclusions that you can draw from Born Again, each as logical as the next (although some interpretations may be a little less obvious than others). Again, this is the way of literature.
To give another example of what I mean when I say that literature is, by nature, subjective, and there are many ways to interpret it:
Take the Harry Potter books. Now, of course the most obvious interpretation of the Harry Potter books is that Harry Potter is a young wizard who goes to a wizarding school and faces off against the evil Lord Voldemort on occasion. This interpretation is obvious, and it's also perfectly logical, if viewed from that world's framework.
However, I've also seen an interpretation where Harry is actually an abused kid who invents this fantasy world as an escape from the abuse he suffers at home, and the entire thing takes place in his mind. This is also a perfectly logical interpretation of the books, if somewhat less obvious and less satisfying (for me, at least).
So we have two interpretations that completely contradict each other, but they are equally logical. And this is OK. Because this is literature, and that's the way literature is. You pick the interpretation that works for you.
Now, I think I understand a bit about where you're coming from. Maybe. After all, one of my major pet peeves is the whole concept of, "it depends on what you believe," (when the truth is, nothing depends on what you believe, except, well, your beliefs and your actions). I hate this entire argument in principle, except when it comes to those few things in life that are truly subjective... things like, say, literature.
All of this is a rather roundabout way of saying, again, that Born Again is, in fact, open to interpretation. I am not saying that in order to make an unfounded argument. I am saying it because it's true. It's literature - its nature is to be open to interpretation.
Plus, there is simply no definitive proof of God/not God either way. And even if there were definitive proof, which there isn't, it would still be open to interpretation. Because, again, that is the way of literature.
"God might be there. Full stop." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wolverine might be there. Full stop.
With Cyclops. Okay, now full stop. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Katerine Flying Blind
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 45 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
james castle wrote: | Wolverine might be there. Full stop.
With Cyclops. Okay, now full stop. |
True. All we know is that, if they were there, we didn't see them.
In fact, I could probably come up with a decent missing-scene story, if my memory of Born Again were refreshed, and if I had a decent understanding of those two characters (which I don't, so never mind).
Again, I am not trying to make a case for God being there, or for God not being there, because my memory of Born Again is too vague, and because, again, I think this entire argument is silly. We just don't know. We can read into it whatever works for us. This is the way it should be. Why is this a problem for people?
What I DON'T like, is when people say that God was definitely there, or definitely not there, and label either of these things as logic, when neither of these things is shown! That's not logic. Logic does not allow you to pass off an unknown quantity as a known one.
Like most computer programmers, I like logic, and I don't like to see it mishandled, mislabeled, misunderstood, or maligned. Call it a pet peeve of mine. (I have many of those, actually. Hopefully you won't have the opportunity to see most of them.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|