Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


Who are you going to vote for President?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The off-topic section
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who are you going to vote for President?
MCaine
16%
 16%  [ 2 ]
Obama
58%
 58%  [ 7 ]
I'm not voting
25%
 25%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 12

Author Message
Punisher74
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 103
Location: Carbondale, Illinois

PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:04 pm    Post subject: Who are you going to vote for President? Reply with quote

I am going to vote for MCain. Who are you going to vote for?
_________________
"Helpful. Cooperative. Stupid. That's my boys." Frank Castle (a.k.a. The Punisher) Welcome Back Frank Series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
train
Guardian Devil


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 659
Location: Hell's Pantry

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If there was ever a topic that is ripe for a webmaster lock, this is it. What I post below is in no way meant to be disparaging to anyone that feels differently. It's just my opinion and not meant to stir up retalitory posts. That being said....

Gotta be Obama for me. McCain was my horse back in 2000. I really liked the guy. But the McCain of 2008 is a hollow shell of the man that ran against George W. I don't think that Obama is the messiah...there are several of his policies that I have some reservations about, but it seems that when I look at the sum of each of the candidates, Obama gets my vote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the spirit of doing the impossible (keeping a political thread civil) even I will post something nice and reasonable.

I'm Canadian so I can't vote but if I could it'd be for Obama.

That aside, I'm impressed that train (or anyone for that matter) actually switched camps. I've always thought that, for the most part, people are liberal or conservative and that's that. In theory people are supposed to weigh the candidates and vote for who's best at the time. I'm amazed that theory is being put into practice at least by one person.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think we'll be able to keep this thread civil, no problem.

I'm Swedish so I obviously can't vote either. If I could, I'd definitely vote for Obama. I don't think he's perfect (from a European perspective. the more free trade-leaning ideas of most reasonable Republicans would probably be better in some respects), but after having lived in the States for a combined total of three years my sympathies lie with the candidate I think would be better for the American people. Then again, I've never supported a Republican candidate for president. My values when it comes to women's and gay rights are just too darn Northern European, I suppose.

There's also the Palin factor to consider. With McCain's age being what it is, you need a VP candidate who could actually rule the most powerful country in the world. The "I can see Russia from my house" bit just won't cut it. She didn't even know what the Bush doctrine was.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rgj
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

double post
_________________
rgj


Last edited by rgj on Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rgj
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: The Rio Grande Valley of Texas

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama.

Of course, I live in Texas, so casting a vote for Democrat is like spitting into the wind. Luckily, we have 49 other states that have a say so. But, all you can do is your part in the process.

Now, I'll just leave the discussion here. Like train said, this thread is very ripe. I better go before I offend someone with a Joe the Plumber joke. Yee Ha! I'd hate to go all Bill Maher on you.
_________________
rgj
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darediva
Wake Up


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1208
Location: Hell's Kitchen South, Arkansas, USA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This will be the first time I've publicly said who I have voted for. Yeah, already have cast my ballot for Obama.

I'm with train. I would have gone with McCain in 2000 over Bush any day of the week. My YellowDawgDemocrat daddy would be spinning in his grave if he knew I once voted for Nixon, too.

Then again, I've voted for Carter, Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton (in the Arkansas primary elections). I don't vote along party lines like my parents did. I try to look at the person I think will do the best job. (Ok, so I was 18 when I voted for Nixon. So sue me.)

My personal opinion is that you should vote for the candidate of your choice. I won't try to tell you who to vote for, and won't let you tell me who to vote for. Fair enough? The only people I hold issue with are the ones who say they won't vote, then bellyache about who won.

Like you, rgj, voting for Obama in Arkansas is almost a waste of time. Most people here will give you the reason they won't is because he's for gun control. I don't believe that for a moment.
_________________
Alice




Those who throw dirt merely lose ground.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Darediva wrote:

My personal opinion is that you should vote for the candidate of your choice. I won't try to tell you who to vote for, and won't let you tell me who to vote for. Fair enough? The only people I hold issue with are the ones who say they won't vote, then bellyache about who won.


Okay, still gonna keep this sophisticated but I must say I disagree. First, people trying to "tell people who to vote for" is called political life. A free exchange of ideas is absolutely critical to any political system and especially to a democracy. Everyone voting with their gut feeling is exactly what we don't want. Plus, no one is smart enough that they can figure everything out themselves. I imagine that sometimes when someone tries to "tell" someone else "who to vote for" the person being told is actually convinced by sound argument and changes their opinion. That's democracy in action.

As for the second point, that's a little more contentious so I'll try to tred lightly. Fact is, however, that I haven't voted in a federal election in years and years. I cast my non-vote for a number of reasons. Mostly it's because I've only ever lived in two ridings. One in Calgary that has gone Conservative for my entire lifetime and now in Toronto in a riding that has gone Liberal for my entire lifetime. Meaningless slogans aside, as a matter of cold hard fact, my vote literally could not make a difference (if I did vote I'd vote NDP).

In a much broader sense though I think democracy, as it exists in Canada and especially as it exists in the US, is a bit of a lie. Parties make politics murky and the shocking ignorance of most voters make the whole process silly. Plus, the homeless don't vote and that bothers me. I think the poor are disenfranchised in a subtle but deliberate way. In sum, I'm not sure the system is altogether on the up and up and so I hesitate to vote for fear that to do so may add some legitimacy to it.

As for not voting dissentitling me from whining, well, I can't imagine why that would be so. No one has every explained the reasoning behind that to me and I've always considered it a rather empty statement used to encourage people to vote. I didn't vote in the election that saw Hitler rise to power and yet surely I can point out that he was a very bad man. I didn't vote for or against Bush but surely I can still comment on the job he did as President.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
harryhausen
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 129
Location: U$A

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama. He's as close as we can get to a real Socialist (in this country). I really liked Kucinich better, but I reckon he's too short?

I happen to live in North Carolina - shockingly, a "battleground state" this year - and it's been really exciting. We've got lots of interesting state and local races, too. It's wild to see the uber-conservative Bible Belt turning away from the current Republican party with such speed; 30,000 people at the Obama rally here several months ago.....

Now if I could just get Ollie Queen as the mayor.........
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
As for not voting dissentitling me from whining, well, I can't imagine why that would be so. No one has every explained the reasoning behind that to me and I've always considered it a rather empty statement used to encourage people to vote. I didn't vote in the election that saw Hitler rise to power and yet surely I can point out that he was a very bad man. I didn't vote for or against Bush but surely I can still comment on the job he did as President.

About voting, or not, and being unhappy with the outcome, I think it's pretty obvious that that only applies to elections in which you're eligible to vote.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:
james castle wrote:
As for not voting dissentitling me from whining, well, I can't imagine why that would be so. No one has every explained the reasoning behind that to me and I've always considered it a rather empty statement used to encourage people to vote. I didn't vote in the election that saw Hitler rise to power and yet surely I can point out that he was a very bad man. I didn't vote for or against Bush but surely I can still comment on the job he did as President.

About voting, or not, and being unhappy with the outcome, I think it's pretty obvious that that only applies to elections in which you're eligible to vote.


But why? Where's the connection?

See, there's also deeper issues with the whole "didn't vote? now you have no say!" argument. Say, for example there's a guy who intends to vote but gets in a car accident on the way there. I assume people have no problem with his non-vote. I assume it's enough that he intended to vote. But now we're really far afield. What if this guy is in one of the stronghold ridings? One that will go a certain way for sure. Are we really saying that a person who intended to cast a vote that wouldn't have mattered but didn't is interesting at all?

At the end of the day I'm just not a big fan of symbolism. My thinking is very ends based. Either an action will have an effect or it won't. If it won't there's no value in doing it symbolicly.

Also, what if I post a blog or something about my thoughts on the current Prime Minister. Say lots of people read it and discuss it and think there are valid points in it. What if, weeks later, I reveal that I didn't vote? Is the content of the blog somehow made less valid? What if I then reveal that I wanted to vote but got in a car accident? Is the content valid again? What if I wanted to vote but forgot? Does that make a difference? How about if I wanted to vote but forgot because I was caring for my sick mom? Or if I forgot because I was really into a new videogame I bought? Does that change the content of my blog? Probably not.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To JC: First of all, I don't care if you vote or not, that's your choice. I was merely reacting against bringing in Hitler and Bush when it was clear that Darediva was referring to elections where you have a choice to vote and then decide not to.

I have no interest in getting into a discussion of the morals of not voting. And, getting into the details of what event prevented someone from voting is not terribly interesting and it also means missing the big picture. I guess what I object to is a "screw the system" attitude from people who make no effort to change the system. If a person makes that effort some other way, such as through blogging or posting videos on YouTube or whatever, that's perfectly fine.

The people who don't care about anything outside of themselves or have no interest in learning anything or participating in anything are not morally objectionable, as far as I see it, they're just not the kind of people I'd like to hang out with.

One last point though: Is voting symbolic? If you're an Obama fan living in Alaska, then your vote is symbolic. It won't count in the end. That's one of the many reasons I think the electoral college system is crazy. On the other hand, how much does anyone's vote really count? When I go to vote for Parliament, my vote is one out of several million. My vote is counted, by will it really affect the outcome of the election? Probably not. But if everyone stopped voting because of this, then what kind of situation have we created?
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
train
Guardian Devil


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 659
Location: Hell's Pantry

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:
I think the electoral college system is crazy.


not trying to hijack this thread, but i've felt this way for some time now. i live in Missouri with 11 electoral college votes. California has 55 electoral college votes. as a result, a resident of California's vote is worth 5 times the value of mine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jumonji
Guardian Devil


Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 636
Location: Too close to the Arctic circle

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

train wrote:
jumonji wrote:
I think the electoral college system is crazy.


not trying to hijack this thread, but i've felt this way for some time now. i live in Missouri with 11 electoral college votes. California has 55 electoral college votes. as a result, a resident of California's vote is worth 5 times the value of mine.

I'm not sure that's true, because I'm assuming that the number of electoral votes should be well correlated with the population in each state, right?

However, the real problem is that the system is so digital. If you vote with the minority, your vote doesn't count at all, but if you vote with the majority your vote carries more weight. Let's say you're in Texas and McCain wins that state by 60% to 40%. Then, the people who are in the 40% get 0% representation, whereas the McCain voters have their votes count as one and two thirds (1 divided by 0.6).

As I see it, one person should each get one vote. Period. That would also mean that the candidates would have to spend time talking to voters everywhere and not just in the battleground states.
_________________
The Other Murdock Papers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
train
Guardian Devil


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 659
Location: Hell's Pantry

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumonji wrote:
train wrote:
a resident of California's vote is worth 5 times the value of mine.


I'm not sure that's true, because I'm assuming that the number of electoral votes should be well correlated with the population in each state, right?


yes, electoral votes are correlated with population, but it's a winner take all in nearly all states...theoretically, a candidate can win California by one vote and collect all 55 electoral votes. a presidential candidate can win as few as 11 states and become president regardless of the vote in the rest of the country. in 2000, Bush lost the popluar vote by 500,000 votes, but because his electoral votes fell in "key" states, he was awarded the office.

jumonji wrote:
However, the real problem is that the system is so digital. If you vote with the minority, your vote doesn't count at all, but if you vote with the majority your vote carries more weight. Let's say you're in Texas and McCain wins that state by 60% to 40%. Then, the people who are in the 40% get 0% representation, whereas the McCain voters have their votes count as one and two thirds (1 divided by 0.6).


this is the point that i was making, but on the level of electoral college votes, not popular vote.

jumonji wrote:
As I see it, one person should each get one vote. Period.


agreed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The off-topic section All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group